成唯識論了義燈 2.129

2.129

又解依種，若以翻彼，現成不依種，即不成亦不依，如種成依種立，不成復依何？據體不成，即無體故，二解任情。若自在及種子，體在無能，名為非得，亦依種立。

Yet another explanation is that it relies on the seed: if in inverting that [accomplishment], the actual accomplishment does not rely on the seed, then non-accomplishment also does not rely on it; but just as accomplishment of the seed is established based on the seed, upon what then does non-accomplishment rely? In terms of substance, since it is non-accomplished, it lacks substance. Both explanations may be adopted as one prefers. If mastery and seed exist in substance but lack capacity, it is called non-possession, and is likewise established relying on the seed.