成唯識論了義燈 2.30

2.30

敘計中言多實有者，今更助解。實句之中，軍林等假如論說，破彼實有為同喻故，此等少假，餘多實故，科文如疏。今助一科總分為二，初破實有，照彼實等，非緣離識下，破現量得，依敘計中故作二科。

When stating in the exposition of their doctrines that 'many are substantially real (dravyasat)', I will now provide an auxiliary explanation. Within the category of substance, things like an army or a forest are nominal (prajñaptisat), as stated in the treatise; because they serve as similar examples (sādharmya-dṛṣṭānta) in refuting their substantial reality, such things are a few nominal entities while the rest are mostly substantially real, and the textual outline is as given in the commentary. Now, to offer an auxiliary outline, it is divided broadly into two: first, refuting substantial reality; second, from 'reflecting that substance and so forth are not conditions independent of consciousness' downward, refuting that they are apprehended by direct perception. These two outlines are made in accordance with the exposition of their doctrines.