成唯識論了義燈 5.130

5.130

《論》云：見非惠，俱不異惠故者。問：五見不異惠，不得與惠俱者，何故前第四卷說第七惠俱，我見恒行不異惠故？答：有二解，一云：一、俱有名俱；二、相應名俱。前據俱有，此約相應，他性相應非自性故。如覆、誑等是貪癡分，貪分雖貪俱，說與癡相應。若不爾者，豈於貪分立覆等，時不有癡耶？又解不然，諸說俱者解相應門，前據義說，所以云：見雖即惠，如心所中義別故開。今據別體，見非惠俱，不障義分，說與惠並。若爾如何他性相應？若許義別名他相應，貪分覆、誑應貪相應。《論》既不許，前說為勝，於相應門義說俱起，此亦何失？

The treatise says: "Views are not accompanied by wisdom, because they are not different from wisdom." Question: If the five views are not different from wisdom and cannot be accompanied by wisdom, why does the earlier fourth fascicle say that the seventh [consciousness] is accompanied by wisdom, and the view of a self continuously operating is not different from wisdom? Answer: There are two explanations. One says: first, coexistence is called accompanying; second, association (saṃprayoga) is called accompanying. The former is based on coexistence, while this is in terms of association, because association is with another nature, not one's own nature. For instance, concealment and deceit are parts of greed and ignorance; although the greed-portion coexists with greed, it is said to be associated with ignorance. If it were not so, how could it be that when establishing concealment and so forth upon the greed-portion, ignorance is not present? Another explanation says this is not so: all statements of accompanying explain the gate of association. The former is based on meaning, which is why it says: although a view is wisdom itself, because its meaning is differentiated among mental factors, it is opened out. Now, based on distinct entities, a view is not accompanied by wisdom, but this does not prevent their distinct aspects of meaning from being spoken of as concurrent with wisdom. If so, how can they be associated with another nature? If distinct meanings are called association with another, concealment and deceit of the greed-portion should be associated with greed. Since the treatise does not allow this, the previous explanation is superior; in the gate of association, they are spoken of as arising together in terms of meaning—what fault is there in this?