成唯識論了義燈 5.6

5.6

《論》：若與藏識有異等者。《要集》云：有說：有解三位無故，無恒轉義，亦不應理，未斷滅來恒續起故。同第八識，未入四位，恒名賴耶，故依有釋無，故不說，或相同不說。今謂不爾。賴耶設入四位，未成無漏，故說恒轉。不約名說，恒轉如流。末那三位，轉成無漏，轉易非恒，故不如流。

The treatise says: "If it were different from the storehouse consciousness..." The Yaoji states: Some say: "Some explain that because it is absent in the three states, it lacks the characteristic of flowing continuously; this also is illogical. As long as it has not been severed, it constantly arises in succession, identical to the eighth consciousness: before entering the four states, it is constantly called ālaya. Therefore, explaining nonexistence based on existence, it is not mentioned, or because their characteristics are identical it is not mentioned." Now, I maintain that this is not so. Even if the ālaya enters the four states, as long as it has not become untainted, it is said to flow continuously. It is not spoken of in terms of its name; its continuous flow is like a torrent. Manas transforms into the untainted in the three states; its transformation and alteration are not continuous, and therefore it is not like a torrent.