成唯識論了義燈 6.156

6.156

滅諦初滅，《要集》三解：初解諦實性假，自性不生。是擇滅故（即與第二不別），後釋性、諦俱實，無故不生，性實可爾，常故不生，與本性滅何別？故唯第二依本疏正。

[Regarding] the first cessation of the truth of cessation: the Yaoji gives three explanations. The first explanation is that it is truth-real and nature-nominal, being non-arising of self-nature. Because it is pratisaṃkhyānirodha (which is not distinct from the second). The later explanation is that it is both nature- and truth-real, non-arising due to non-existence; nature-real is acceptable, but if it is non-arising due to permanence, how does it differ from fundamental-nature cessation? Therefore, only the second is correct according to the foundational commentary.