成唯識論了義燈 6.59

6.59

答：據不以不共無明為緣發行，云不緣無明，更造諸行，異彼外法所有異生，故彼文云：是故唯依外法異生，我說順次雜染緣起，最極圓滿，非住內法。若即依文，應知內法諸有學者，皆不造行，與前相違。前云內法異生若放逸者，彼除一種不共無明，所餘無明為緣生行，又《緣起經》、《雜集論》、及此論，皆聖者不造新業，不言諸有學皆不造新業。

Answer: In terms of not using unshared ignorance as a condition to activate formations, it is said that they "do not create further formations conditioned by ignorance," distinguishing them from all external pṛthagjanas. Therefore that text says: "Therefore, solely relying on external pṛthagjanas, I teach the forward-order defiled dependent origination to be most complete, not for those abiding in the internal doctrine." If one were to adhere strictly to the literal text, it would follow that all internal followers in training do not create formations at all, which would contradict what was said before. Earlier it was said that if internal pṛthagjanas are negligent, then with the exception of the single kind of unshared ignorance, the remaining kinds of ignorance serve as conditions to generate formations. Furthermore, the Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra, the Samuccaya, and this treatise all state that noble ones do not create new karma; they do not say that all those in training do not create new karma.