成唯識論了義燈 7.91

7.91

問：准無性《攝論》，初悟遍計、次悟依他、後悟圓實。准此論第八，引經頌云「非不見真如，而能了諸行」等，即先悟圓實、次悟依他。又復無性《攝論》初文，地前悟初二性，第二文地前通悟三性，何故不同？

Question: According to Asamāhita's commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, first one awakens to the imagined nature, next to the other-dependent nature, and finally to the consummate nature. According to the eighth fascicle of this treatise, citing the sūtra verse: "Not without seeing tathatā / Can one comprehend conditioned phenomena" and so forth, one first awakens to the consummate nature, and next to the other-dependent nature. Furthermore, in the first passage of Asamāhita's commentary, before the grounds (bhūmi) one awakens to the first two natures, whereas in the second passage, before the grounds one awakens to all three natures. Why are they not consistent?