成唯識論了義燈 7.111

7.111

It also states: "When correct wisdom realizes tathatā, there is no objective aspect, but there must be the cognitive aspect and so forth; therefore we know that it is not because of the presence of the cognitive aspect and so forth that the self-authenticating aspect and so forth has comprehension or non-comprehension." This objection is unreasonable. This is stated based on the contaminated and not with respect to the uncontaminated; how can one raise the uncontaminated as an objection?