成唯識論演祕 2.307

2.307

釋曰：若成他身，有趣身業自他雜過。非非相續，謂是非情，若成非情便壞法性，為是有情，為非情耶？

The explanation states: If one were to possess another's continuum, there would be the fault of confusing one's own and others' bodily actions in different destinies. 'What is non-continuous' refers to insentient things; if one were to possess insentient things, that would destroy the nature of phenomena—would it be sentient, or would it be insentient?