成唯識論演祕 2.307

2.307

The explanation states: If one were to possess another's continuum, there would be the fault of confusing one's own and others' bodily actions in different destinies. 'What is non-continuous' refers to insentient things; if one were to possess insentient things, that would destroy the nature of phenomena—would it be sentient, or would it be insentient?