成唯識論演祕 3.7

3.7

問：因論生論，他若救云，無為體性雖非緣生，而能隔彼立緣生名，斯亦何失？亦如想受無為等義。

Question: One treatise leads to another treatise: if the opponent rescues [their position] by saying that although the substance of the unconditioned is not produced by conditions, yet it can delimit them and establish the name 'produced by conditions'—what fault is there in this? It is just like the meaning of the unconditioned of ideation and sensation, and so forth.