成唯識論演祕 4.94

4.94

釋曰：外又救云：和合意識別生意識，前後間起，亦不違經無同類並。故復破云：和合識體許是異熟，若間生者，體便間斷。若爾，後續應名更生。故量破云：和合意識不應間生；許是異熟故；猶如報色。又異熟體唯恒相續，更無異趣。

The exposition states: The opponent again saves [their thesis] by saying: 'The blending mental consciousness and the separately arising mental consciousness arise alternately with interruptions before and after; this also does not contradict the sūtra's prohibition against the simultaneous arising of the same category.' Hence it is refuted again: 'The entity of the blending consciousness is conceded to be retribution; if it arose with interruptions, its entity would be interrupted. If so, subsequent linking would have to be called being reborn anew.' Therefore, a syllogistic refutation is framed: The blending mental consciousness should not arise with interruptions; because it is conceded to be retribution; like retribution materiality. Furthermore, the entity of retribution is only constantly continuous, having no other destiny.