成唯識論演祕 5.370

5.370

如《對法論》、《疏》、《燈》雖引，讀猶難悟。今重略明。彼論問云：何因十五是我所見？相應我所故，隨轉我所故，不離我所故。相應我所者，謂我有色，由我與彼相應，說有彼故。隨轉我所者，謂色屬我，若彼由此自在力轉，或捨或役，世間說彼是我所故。不離我所者，謂我在色中，彼計實我處在蘊中遍體隨行故。餘蘊各然。

Although cited in the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya, Commentary, and Deng, it is still difficult to comprehend upon reading. Now it is briefly explained again. That treatise asks: For what reason are fifteen [propositions] the view of what belongs to self? Because of what belongs to self through association, what belongs to self through conformity, and what belongs to self through non-separation. 'What belongs to self through association' means: I possess form; because of the self's association with it, it is said to possess it. 'What belongs to self through conformity' means: form belongs to me; if it operates through the self's power of sovereignty, whether discarded or employed, the world says it belongs to me. 'What belongs to self through non-separation' means: I am in form; they conceive a real self dwelling within the aggregates, pervading the entity and conforming with it. The other aggregates are each like this.