成唯識論演祕 5.44

5.44

問：「非所斷」者，理有二義：一、無學身中有漏性者，在無漏身，名為無漏，亦名非斷；二、體無漏亦為無漏，而非是斷，無學色根許非斷攝，斯亦何過？

Question: Regarding 'not to be severed,' in principle there are two meanings: first, what is sāsrava in nature within the person of an aśaikṣa, because it resides in an anāsrava person, is designated anāsrava and is also designated not to be severed; second, what is anāsrava in substance is also anāsrava and is not to be severed. If the physical faculties of an aśaikṣa are permitted to be subsumed under non-severance, what fault is there in this?