成唯識論演祕 5.99

5.99

詳曰：今助後師責前師曰：論據何事須隨少意？又，復主捨何擯不取，豈不主意而相例乎？又，餘七成不據多分，何獨憂根約多分耶？故救未可。

I evaluate: I now assist the later master in reproaching the former master, saying: Based on what fact does the treatise need to follow the minor opinion? Moreover, why is the primary [faculty of] equanimity discarded and not taken? How could it not follow the mental faculty as an analogy? Furthermore, the possession of the remaining seven is not based on the majority; why should the grief faculty alone be based on the majority? Therefore, the rescue is untenable.