成唯識論演祕 5.99

5.99

I evaluate: I now assist the later master in reproaching the former master, saying: Based on what fact does the treatise need to follow the minor opinion? Moreover, why is the primary [faculty of] equanimity discarded and not taken? How could it not follow the mental faculty as an analogy? Furthermore, the possession of the remaining seven is not based on the majority; why should the grief faculty alone be based on the majority? Therefore, the rescue is untenable.