成唯識論演祕 6.206

English (machine translation) 6.206

Language: English

6.206

The explanation is: This refutes the Saṃmatīya school, because they posit that the object exists continuously (saṃtāna); therefore, it only refutes the seeing. Furthermore, for the momentariness proponents (kṣaṇavādin), when this awareness occurs, present objects like form have also all already perished; how could one accept direct perception (pratyakṣa) at this time?

Previous: 6.205
Next: 6.207
Up: 6

Linked texts (1)

成唯識論演祕 — Classical Chinese