成唯識論演祕 7.96

English (machine translation) 7.96

Language: English

7.96

Question: A verse in the Madhyāntavibhāga says: 'In unmovingness and non-distortion, / it is known that the referent is non-existent, / yet not non-existent like an illusion, etc., / because of unmovingness in existence and non-existence.' It takes the metaphor of an illusion and so forth to illustrate the imagined nature. Since the two treatises diverge, what are their respective intentions?

Previous: 7.95
Next: 7.97
Up: 7

Linked texts (1)

成唯識論演祕 — Classical Chinese