成唯識論演祕 7.96

7.96

問：《中邊頌》云：「於不動無倒，謂知義非有，非無如幻等，有無不動故。」以幻喻等喻計所執。二論既差，各有何意？

Question: A verse in the Madhyāntavibhāga says: 'In unmovingness and non-distortion, / it is known that the referent is non-existent, / yet not non-existent like an illusion, etc., / because of unmovingness in existence and non-existence.' It takes the metaphor of an illusion and so forth to illustrate the imagined nature. Since the two treatises diverge, what are their respective intentions?