因明入正理論疏 1.17

English (machine translation) 1.17

Language: English

1.17

Second question: "A true reason and true illumination may properly be called hetuvidyā. A fallacious reason (hetvābhāsa) and fallacious illumination should not be hetuvidyā." Answer: "Because mentioning the true encompasses the fallacious; or because it has already subsumed them; or because it illuminates them collaterally, not as primary illumination."

Previous: 1.16
Next: 1.18
Up: 1

Linked texts (1)

因明入正理論疏 — Classical Chinese