肇論新疏 3.196

3.196

初二句明二法相因，由有於無，所以是有。下句例之。次二句，承前以生二名。然則下，順明相待兩成。離有下，反顯不待皆非。有無相生下，引類。非直有無相待，至於高下、是非、前後等皆然也。

The first two lines clarify that the two dharmas depend upon each other: because it is existent in relation to non-existence, it is therefore existence. The next line follows the same rule. The next two lines follow from the preceding to give rise to the two names. From 'thus' downward positively clarifies that they depend upon each other for mutual establishment. From 'apart from existence' downward negatively shows that without mutual dependence neither can stand. From 'existence and non-existence generate each other' downward cites an analogy. Not only do existence and non-existence depend upon each other, but the same also applies to high and low, right and wrong, before and after, and so on.