肇論新疏 3.198

3.198

初二句中，對有之時，無乃是無。若二法相待，因有生無，皆是緣有也。此乃下，隨有無而興言象，依言象而起是非，豈足明於幽深神妙之道乎？

In the first two lines, when opposed to existence, non-existence is indeed non-existence. But if the two dharmas depend on each other, non-existence arising because of existence, both are conditioned existences. From 'these are' downward shows that words and forms arise following existence and non-existence, and right and wrong arise relying on words and forms; how could they suffice to illuminate the profound, deep, and marvelous path?