法智遺編觀心二百問 1.125

1.125

問：仁於前書堅執內、外二觀並修，方名事、理不二，今那改云內心理觀？自說事、理不二，豈非竊予之義為己見耶？

Question: In your previous letter you stubbornly maintained that internal and external contemplations must be cultivated together to be named the non-duality of phenomena and principle. Why do you now change your statement to saying that the contemplation of principle of the internal mind itself speaks of the non-duality of phenomena and principle? Is this not plagiarizing my meaning as your own view?