四明十義書 1.123

1.123

且《義例》、本論色心不二，既先觀內心三千攝於外色為不二已，歷外之時何得不約色具三千攝內心等諸法為不二耶？何用改轉自語令義不圓耶？

Moreover, the Yili fundamentally discusses the non-duality of form and mind; after one has first contemplated that the three thousand of the inner mind absorbs external form as non-dual, when traversing the external, how could one not speak of form possessing the three thousand and absorbing the inner mind and all other dharmas as non-dual? What need is there to alter your own words and render the meaning non-complete?