佛祖歷代通載 20.131

20.131

晦庵曰。性固不能不動。然無所不有。然不能不動。其無所不有者。曷甞有虧之哉。釋氏之病錯認精神魂魄為性。果能見性不可謂之妄見。既曰妄見。不可言性之本空。此等立語未瑩。恐亦是見得未分明也。

Huian said: "The nature indeed cannot be without activity; yet there is nothing it does not contain. Though it cannot be without activity, how could that which contains everything ever be diminished? The flaw of the Śramaṇa lies in mistakenly identifying the spirit and soul as the nature. If one is truly able to see the nature, it cannot be called a deluded perception; having already termed it a deluded perception, one cannot say that the nature is fundamentally empty. Such formulations are not lucid, and I fear his insight was also not distinct."