廣弘明集 13.149
廣弘明集 13.149
- Language
- Classical Chinese
13.149
內箴曰。大廈為眾材所成。群生非一人可化。故十方聖智。比塵沙而不窮。八萬法門。傾河海而莫測。故有此聖彼聖。殊方類於比肩。前佛後佛。異世同於繼踵。像正差降淨穢區分。懲惡勸善其流一也。且周孔世訓。尚無改於百王。雛孟劇談。猶垂美於千載。豈容周姬一代而三變三遷。老氏一身而成道成佛。即是餘人無踐聖之理。群萌絕登道之期。又先譏十異後讚一同。首軸之間毀譽矛盾。卷舒之際向背參商。掩目盜裘信有斯諺。夫真偽相形。猶禾莠之相類。善耘者存禾而去莠。求道者亦依真而捨偽。沙門之勝宗流久矣。至如漢帝降禮於摩騰(如法本傳)吳王屈節於康會(吳錄云。吳主問僧會。佛法何以異俗。答曰。為惡於顯人得而誅之。為惡於隱鬼得而誅之。易云。積善餘慶。詩詠求福不回雖儒俗之格言。亦佛法之漸訓也)曇始延魏君之席(魏錄云。拓拔燾用崔皓之說。遂滅佛法悉毀像燒經驅僧還俗。曇始以正旦杖錫法衣立於城門。門者白燾。燾命斬之。三刀而不傷。刑者白燾。燾自取佩刀。又如前斫。乃內始於虎圈。虎閉眼伏頭。燾乃試置天師圈側虎鳴吼欲噬。燾乃知佛化清高黃老所不及。延始上席謝之)道林登晉主之床。秦世道安榮參共輦。趙邦澄上寵懋錦衣(符書云。符主出遊命安師共輦坐。高僧傳云。石虎號澄為大和上。衣以錦繡每上殿。勅王公等扶舁之)皆道降極尊德迴萬乘。良有以也。黃老之術由來不競者。費才以捔勝損躬。崔皓以邪誣喪體(魏書云。崔皓寇謙之勸拓拔燾滅正教。燾後身發惡疾乃誅崔寇二人)姜斌以集詐徒質。王浮以造偽殃身。皆驗之於耳目。非取與之虛談。其崇敬也如此。其疵譴也如彼。夫顏閔遇於孔門摽德行之首。蘇張逢於鬼谷居浮詐之先。非獨人性之優劣。亦所習之真偽也。且賢佞相濫。佞泄而賢彰。聖詐難分。詐窮而聖顯。猶蛇床與蘼蕪類質。達方者辨其容。苟吻與素華齊根。曉藥者分其性。是以公旦黜而還輔。孔門虛而復盈。有自來矣。自漢明捔試邪見折鋒。慧日凝輝法雲舒蔭。姜潘捨家入道。呂焦棄偽從真。曹馬傳燈而不窮。秦魏涌泉而無竭。汝言始於澄石。不亦誣哉。自黃老風澆容服亦變。非道非俗諺號閹人。善詛善罵古名鬼卒。其救苦也。則解髮繫頸以繩自縛。牛糞塗身互相鞭打。其法律也。若失符籙則倒銜手板逆風掃地。楊枝百束自斫自負。盜奏章也。則匍匐灰獄背負水漚(出道士孫氏法儀)責罰尤重。同奴隷之法。罪譴銜伏。比畜生之類。然釋門鍾磬集眾警時。漢魏已來。道家未有金剛師子護法善神。蓋佛教之所明。非黃領之先搆。亦効他勝範。竊我聖蹤耳。故顏之推云。神仙之事有金玉之費。頗為虛放。華山之下白骨如莾。何有得仙之理。縱使得仙終當有死。不能出世。余勸汝曹學之。佛家三世之事信而有徵。家業歸心勿輕慢也。原夫四塵五蔭剖折形有。六舟三駕運載群生。萬行歸空千門入善。辯才智慧豈徒六經百氏之博哉。明非堯舜周孔老莊所及。故著歸心篇以誡子弟。爾不能知。其盲九也。
The Inner Admonition says: A grand mansion is built of many timbers; living beings cannot be converted by a single person. Thus the sacred wisdom of the ten directions is inexhaustible as the grains of dust and sand, and the eighty-four thousand Dharma-gates are fathomless as the poured-out rivers and oceans. Hence there are this sage and that sage, shoulder-to-shoulder across disparate realms; and previous Buddhas and later Buddhas, heel-to-heel across different ages. The semblance and true [teachings] decline and descend, and the pure and defiled are divided, yet in punishing evil and encouraging good, their current is one. Furthermore, the worldly instructions of the Duke of Zhou and Confucius have remained unaltered by a hundred kings; the vigorous discourses of the young Mencius still bequeath their beauty after a thousand years. How could one generation of the Ji lineage of Zhou undergo three transformations and three shifts? How could Laozi in one single body attain the Dao and become a Buddha? If that were so, no other person could ever tread the path to sagehood, and all living beings would be cut off from ascending to the Way. Moreover, you first mocked the ten differences, and later praised the single identity; between the opening and closing of your scroll, slander and praise contradict each other, and in rolling and unrolling it, your allegiances are as split as Shen and Shang. Truly there is the proverb about closing one's eyes to steal a coat! Now, when the true and false are set side by side, they resemble grain and weeds. A skilled weeder preserves the grain and removes the weeds; a seeker of the Way also relies on the true and abandons the false. The superior tradition of the śramaṇa has flowed for a long time. For instance, the Han Emperor lowered his protocol before Kāśyapa Mātaṅga (as recorded in the Faben zhuan); the King of Wu bowed in humility to Kang Senghui (the Wu lu records: The Lord of Wu asked Senghui, 'How does the Buddha's Dharma differ from the secular?' He replied, 'If one commits evil openly, men may execute him; if one commits evil in secret, ghosts may execute him. The Book of Changes says: "He who heaps up goodness shall have an abundance of blessings." The Book of Odes sings: "Seek blessings without faltering." Though these are the maxims of the Ruists and worldly folk, they are also the gradual instructions of the Buddha's Dharma'); Daoshi was invited to the seat of the Wei monarch (the Wei lu records: Tuoba Tao adopted the words of Cui Hao, whereupon he extinguished the Buddha's Dharma, destroying all statues, burning sūtras, and forcing monks to return to lay life. On New Year's Day, Daoshi, holding his tin staff and wearing his Dharma robes, stood at the city gate. The gatekeeper reported this to Tao. Tao ordered him beheaded, but after three blows of the blade he was unharmed. The executioner reported this to Tao; Tao took his own belt-dagger and struck again as before, [still without harming him]. He then placed Daoshi into the tiger enclosure; the tigers closed their eyes and lowered their heads. Tao then tested placing the Celestial Master next to the enclosure; the tigers roared and wished to devour him. Tao then knew that the Buddha's conversion is pure and lofty, far beyond the reach of Huang-Lao; he invited Daoshi to the high seat and apologized to him); Daolin mounted the couch of the Jin ruler; in the Qin period, Dao'an was honored to share the emperor's carriage; and in the Zhao state, the Master Deng was lavishly favored with brocade robes (the Fu shu records: When the Lord of Fu went on an outing, he ordered Master An to sit with him in the imperial carriage. The Gaoseng zhuan records: Shi Hu called Fotudeng the Great Upādhyāya, clothed him in brocade and embroidery, and whenever he ascended the palace hall, ordered the princes and dukes to assist in carrying him). In all these cases, the Way humbled the utmost supreme, and their virtue turned the ten-thousand-chariot monarchs around. Truly there was good reason for this! As for the arts of Huang-Lao, they have never been able to compete: Fei Cai lost his life in a contest of skill; Cui Hao ruined his body through heterodoxy and slander (the Wei shu records: Cui Hao and Kou Qianzhi urged Tuoba Tao to extinguish the true teaching. Later, Tao broke out in a loathsome illness, whereupon he executed both Cui and Kou); Jiang Bin was exposed in deceit and suffered punishment; and Wang Fu brought disaster upon himself by fabricating forgeries. All these are verified by our ears and eyes, and are not empty talk of taking and giving. Such was the reverence [for Buddhism], and such was the castigation [of Daoism]! When Yan Hui and Min Ziqian entered the gate of Confucius, they stood foremost in virtuous conduct; when Su Qin and Zhang Yi met the Master of Guigu, they ranked first in superficial deceit. This is not solely due to the superior or inferior nature of a person, but also to the truth or falsity of what they practice. Furthermore, when the worthy and the sycophantic are mingled, the sycophants are exposed while the worthy become manifest; when the sage and the charlatan are hard to distinguish, the charlatan reaches his wits' end while the sage becomes obvious. Just as shechuang and miwu share a similar appearance, yet a skilled pharmacologist can distinguish their forms; and gouwen and suhua share the same root, yet one knowledgeable in medicine can tell apart their natures. Therefore, Duke Dan of Zhou was dismissed yet returned to assist, and Confucius's school was emptied yet filled again. This has a long history! Ever since Han Mingdi's contest where heterodox views had their points blunted, the sun of wisdom has congealed its radiance, and the cloud of Dharma has spread its shade. Jiang and Pan abandoned their homes to enter the Way; Lü and Jiao cast aside the false to follow the true. The Cao and Ma families passed the lamp without end; Qin and Wei gushed forth like springs without drying up. In saying that it only began with Fotudeng and Shi Hu, are you not slandering the truth? Ever since the customs of Huang-Lao deteriorated, their appearance and robes also changed: neither Daoist nor secular, they are popularly called 'eunuchs'; skilled at curses and abuse, in antiquity they were named 'ghost soldiers'. When they deliver people from suffering, they untie their hair, tie their necks, bind themselves with ropes, smear cow dung on their bodies, and whip one another. In their regulations, if they lose their talismans and registers, they hold their tablets upside down in their mouths, sweep the ground against the wind, and cut and carry a hundred bundles of willow branches themselves; if they steal petitions and memorials, they crawl in ash pits, bearing water bubbles on their backs (from the Daoist Master Sun's Fayi). Their punishments are exceedingly heavy, identical to the laws for slaves; bearing their penalties and lying prostrate, they are compared to beasts. Yet the bells and chiming stones of the Śākya school assemble the multitude and alert them to the hours. Since the Han and Wei, the Daoists had no vajra-wielding lions or good guardian spirits of the Dharma; these were elucidated by Buddhism, not originally constructed by the yellow-collared [Daoists]. They merely imitated another's superior model and stole our holy traces! Therefore, Yan Zhitui said: 'The matters of immortals require the expense of gold and jade, and are quite wild and baseless. Below Mount Hua white bones lie thick as weeds; how could there be any principle of attaining immortality? Even if one attains immortality, in the end one must still die, unable to transcend the world. I admonish you not to study it. The Buddhist matters of the three times are trustworthy and verified; take refuge in them with your family, and do not treat them with contempt.' Now, the four dusts and five aggregates dissect corporeal existence; the six boats and three vehicles ferry across the multitude of beings; the ten thousand practices return to emptiness, and the thousand gates lead to goodness. How could their eloquence and wisdom be merely the broad learning of the Six Classics and the hundred philosophers? Clearly they are beyond what Yao, Shun, the Duke of Zhou, Confucius, Laozi, and Zhuangzi could match! Therefore he composed the chapter on 'Taking Refuge' to admonish his descendants. You are unable to know this; this is your ninth blindness.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 辯正論 — Classical Chinese