折疑論 2.47
English (machine translation) 2.47
- Language
- English
2.47
Since what is clarified is so extensive, why should the texts be considered redundant? (Concluding the earlier statement about 'tens of thousands and hundreds of millions': since the Buddha clarifies inexhaustible and vast matters, why should his scriptural texts be considered redundant?)
Linked texts (1)
- 折疑論 — Classical Chinese