開元釋教錄 10.4.2

10.4.2

無譯人一卷四（二百一十三部二百一十三卷）
眾經目錄卷第三（三百六十二部一千六百八十二卷）
先異譯經一（四十五部多卷二百七十九卷三十八部一卷三十八卷）
禪經二（九部多卷三十八卷三十一部一卷三十一卷）
戒律三（六十八部二百七十三卷）
疑經四（六十二部六十七卷）
注經五（四十部二百四十六卷）
數論六（三十一部三百六十七卷）
義記七（三十八部三百四十一卷）
眾經目錄卷第四（二百二十九部九百八十五卷後部數勘欠五不同）
隨事別名一（一十三部四百一十三卷）
隨事共名二（三十五部四百七十卷）
譬喻三（一十五部三十六卷）
佛名四（一十四部二十九卷）
神呪五（四十七部四十七卷）
總四卷都二十件。凡一千四百三十三部。
三千七百四十一卷（此都部數與前數勘贍三百九十五部未詳所以）。
高齊眾經目錄（武平年沙門統法上撰梵名達摩鬱多羅一卷成）
雜藏錄一（二百九十一部八百七十四卷）
修多羅錄二（一百七十九部三百二十卷）
毘尼錄三（一十九部二百五十六卷）
阿毘曇錄四（五十部四百二十一卷）
別錄第五（三十七部七十四卷）
眾經抄錄六（一百二十七部一百三十七卷）
集錄第七（三十三部一百四十七卷）
人作錄八（五十一部一百六卷）
都八件。經律論真偽。七百八十七部。二千
三百三十四卷（此都數與前數勘欠十一卷不同未詳所以）。
從眾經別錄下四家目錄長房內典二錄
具列篇題。今尋本未獲。但具存其目。
唐眾經目錄五卷（貞觀初普光寺沙門玄琬撰出內典錄）
右內典錄中。引用云。唐舊錄未見其本。
似取隋五卷眾經錄編新經入。餘者大同。
眾經目錄五卷（於隋錄內加奘譯經餘皆無異大唐大敬愛寺沙門靜泰撰）
右從古錄已下三十一家。諸錄之中雖皆
備述。欲尋其本難可備焉。且列名題知其
有據（撰錄者曰又如長房錄中引一乘寺藏錄周錄之中引真寂寺錄義善寺錄玄法寺錄福林寺錄上
之五錄但引其名不言卷數又有陳朝大乘寺藏錄四卷並不知何人製作似是當寺藏經略記由委既扃寺名為
錄未可通行故敘錄次闕而不載）。
梁出三藏記集一十五卷（建初寺沙門釋僧祐撰）
其序略云。祐以庸淺豫憑法門。翹仰玄風
誓弘末化。每至昏曉諷持秋夏講說。未嘗
不心馳菴園影躍靈岳。於是牽課羸志
沿波討源。綴其所聞。名曰出三藏記集。一
撰緣記。二詮名錄。三總經序。四述列傳緣
記。撰則原始之本克昭名錄。詮則年代之
目不墜經序。總則勝集之時足徵列傳。述
則伊人之風可見。並鑽析內經研鏡外籍（云云）。
出三藏記集卷第一（第一卷撰緣記第二至第五詮名錄第六至第十二總經序第十三
至第十五述列傳）
集三藏緣記第一（出大智度論）
十誦律五百羅漢出三藏記第二
菩薩處胎經出八藏記第三
胡漢譯經文字音義同異記第四。應云
梵漢
前後出經異記第五
出三藏記集卷第二
新集撰出經律論錄第一（四百五十部一千八百六十七卷）
新集條解異出經錄第二（直約部名以配重譯不云卷數算極難矣）
新集表序四部律錄第三（初題有卷中無四部一百八十卷）
出三藏記集卷第三
新集安公古異經錄第一（九十二部九十二卷）
新集安公失譯經錄第二（一百四十二部一百四十七卷）
新集安公涼土異經錄第三（五十九部七十九卷）
新集安公關中異經錄第四（二十四部二十四卷）
新集律分為五部記錄第五（出毘婆沙）
新集律分為十八部記錄第六
新集律來漢地四部記錄第七
出三藏記集卷第四
新集續撰失譯雜經錄第一（一千三百六部一千五百七
十卷）
出三藏記集卷第五
新集抄經錄第一（四十六部三百五十一卷）
新集安公疑經錄第二（二十六部三十卷）
新集疑經偽撰雜錄第三（二十部二十六卷）
新集安公注經及雜經志錄第四（四十八部三百五十
九卷）
小乘迷學竺法度造異儀記第五
長安叡法師喻疑第六

Single-fascicle works with unknown translators, section 4 (213 works, 213 fascicles).
Catalogue of Scriptures, fascicle 3 (362 works, 1,682 fascicles):
1. Earlier and alternative translations of scriptures (45 multi-fascicle works, 279 fascicles; 38 single-fascicle works, 38 fascicles);
2. Dhyāna scriptures (9 multi-fascicle works, 38 fascicles; 31 single-fascicle works, 31 fascicles);
3. Vinaya rules (68 works, 273 fascicles);
4. Suspect scriptures (62 works, 67 fascicles);
5. Commentaries on scriptures (40 works, 246 fascicles);
6. Abhidharma (31 works, 367 fascicles);
7. Doctrinal treatises (38 works, 341 fascicles).
Catalogue of Scriptures, fascicle 4 (229 works, 985 fascicles; collating the count of works afterward leaves a discrepancy of five fewer):
1. Specific titles categorized by theme (13 works, 413 fascicles);
2. Common titles categorized by theme (35 works, 470 fascicles);
3. Parables (15 works, 36 fascicles);
4. Names of Buddhas (14 works, 29 fascicles);
5. Dhāraṇī mantras (47 works, 47 fascicles).
In total, four fascicles comprising twenty sections: altogether 1,433 works, 3,741 fascicles (collating this total count of works against the preceding figures shows a surplus of 395 works; the reason is unclear).
Catalogue of Scriptures of the Northern Qi (compiled in the Wuping era by the Director of Śramaṇas Fashang, whose Sanskrit name was Dharmottara; in 1 fascicle):
1. Miscellany Piṭaka Catalogue (291 works, 874 fascicles);
2. Sūtra Catalogue (179 works, 320 fascicles);
3. Vinaya Catalogue (19 works, 256 fascicles);
4. Abhidharma Catalogue (50 works, 421 fascicles);
5. Classified Catalogue (37 works, 74 fascicles);
6. Excerpts from Scriptures Catalogue (127 works, 137 fascicles);
7. Compilations Catalogue (33 works, 147 fascicles);
8. Catalogue of Works by Human Authors (51 works, 106 fascicles).
Comprising 8 sections in all: authentic and spurious sūtras, vinayas, and śāstras, numbering 787 works, 2,334 fascicles (collating this total against the preceding figures shows a discrepancy of 11 fascicles fewer; the reason is unclear).
For the four catalogues from the Classified Catalogue of Scriptures downward, Fei Zhangfang’s catalogue and the Neidian Lu give full lists of section headings; currently, search has failed to secure their full texts, so only their titles are preserved here.
Tang Catalogue of Scriptures in 5 fascicles (compiled in the early Zhenguan era by the śramaṇa Xuanwan of Puguang Temple; cited from the Neidian Lu):
Regarding the above: in the Neidian Lu it is cited as the “Old Tang Catalogue,” but its text has not been seen. It appears to take the Sui five-fascicle Catalogue of Scriptures and interpolate newly translated scriptures, the rest being broadly identical.
Catalogue of Scriptures in 5 fascicles (adding Xuanzang’s translated scriptures into the Sui catalogue, the rest being otherwise identical; compiled by the śramaṇa Jingtai of the Great Da Jing’ai Temple under the Great Tang):
Regarding the above: for the thirty-one cataloguers from the Ancient Catalogue downwards, though all are comprehensively discussed in the various catalogues, when one wishes to search for their original texts it is difficult to find them complete. Their titles are listed here merely to record that they are based on evidence. (The compiler notes: In addition, just as Zhangfang’s catalogue cites the Yicheng Temple Canon Catalogue, and the Zhou Catalogue cites the Zhenji Temple Catalogue, Yishan Temple Catalogue, Xuanfa Temple Catalogue, and Fulin Temple Catalogue—these five catalogues above are only cited by title without stating their fascicle counts; and there is also a 4-fascicle Dacheng Temple Canon Catalogue from the Chen dynasty, none of whose compilers are known. They appear to be brief inventories of the canons of those specific temples. Since their origins are confined to particular temples and their titles are monastic catalogues, they are not suitable for general circulation, and therefore in the sequence of recorded catalogues they are omitted and not recorded.)
Liang Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation in 15 fascicles (compiled by the śramaṇa Shi Sengyou of Jianchu Temple):
Its preface states in summary: “With mediocre and shallow abilities, I, Sengyou, have devoted myself to the gate of the Dharma, gazing up at the profound teaching and vowing to propagate it in this latter age. Whenever dusk or dawn arrives, reciting and upholding; throughout autumn and summer, lecturing and explaining—never has my mind not galloped to Āmrapālī's Grove, nor my shadow leaped toward the Vulture Peak. Thereupon, exerting my feeble determination, I traced the streams back to their springs, and gathered what I had heard into a work titled Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation. First, to record the accounts of origin; second, to establish the catalogue of names; third, to collect sūtra prefaces; fourth, to recount the series of biographies. Compiling the accounts of origin makes the fundamental genesis clearly evident; establishing the catalogue of names keeps the chronological records from falling into obscurity; collecting sūtra prefaces provides adequate testimony for the times of these wondrous assemblies; recounting the series of biographies allows the character of these men to be perceived. All of this is done through analyzing the inner scriptures and scrutinizing external texts, and so forth.”
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 1 (fascicle 1 compiles the accounts of origin; fascicles 2 through 5 establish the catalogue of names; fascicles 6 through 12 collect sūtra prefaces; fascicles 13 through 15 recount the series of biographies):
1. Record of the Origins of the Compilation of the Tripiṭaka (drawn from the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa);
2. Record of the Compilation of the Tripiṭaka by the Five Hundred Arhats from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya;
3. Record of the Compilation of the Eight Piṭakas from the Bodhisattva-garbhastha-sūtra;
4. Record of Similarities and Differences in the Characters, Sounds, and Meanings of Hu and Han Translations of Scriptures (it should say ‘Fan and Han’);
5. Record of Variations Among Successive Translations of Scriptures.
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 2:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Translated Sūtras, Vinayas, and Śāstras (450 works, 1,867 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue Distinguishing Alternative Translations of Scriptures (directly coordinating re-translations merely by work title, without mentioning fascicle counts, making calculation extremely difficult);
3. Newly Compiled Catalogue Recording Prefaces to the Four Vinayas (the initial title lists fascicles, but the body does not: four divisions, 180 fascicles).
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 3:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Ancient and Atypical Scriptures of Master Dao’an (92 works, 92 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Scriptures with Anonymous Translators of Master Dao’an (142 works, 147 fascicles);
3. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Atypical Scriptures from the Liang Region of Master Dao’an (59 works, 79 fascicles);
4. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Atypical Scriptures from the Guanzhong Region of Master Dao’an (24 works, 24 fascicles);
5. Newly Compiled Record of the Division of the Vinaya into Five Sections (drawn from the Vibhāṣā);
6. Newly Compiled Record of the Division of the Vinaya into Eighteen Sections;
7. Newly Compiled Record of the Arrival of the Fourfold Vinaya in the Han Land.
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 4:
1. Newly Compiled Supplementary Catalogue of Miscellaneous Anonymous Scriptures (1,306 works, 1,570 fascicles).
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 5:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Excerpted Scriptures (46 works, 351 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Suspect Scriptures of Master Dao’an (26 works, 30 fascicles);
3. Newly Compiled Miscellaneous Catalogue of Suspect and Spurious Works (20 works, 26 fascicles);
4. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Sūtra Commentaries and Miscellaneous Records of Master Dao’an (48 works, 359 fascicles);
5. Record of the Heterodox Observances Created by Zhu Fadu, a Confused Student of the Hīnayāna;
6. Dharma Master Rui of Chang’an's Clarification of Doubts.