開元釋教錄 10.4
開元釋教錄 10.4
- Language
- Classical Chinese
10.4.1
古經錄一卷
右尋諸舊錄。多稱為古錄。似是秦始皇時
釋利防等所齎經錄。
舊經錄一卷
右似是前漢劉向校書天閣。往見有佛經。
即謂古藏經錄。謂孔壁所藏。或秦正焚書。
人中所藏者。
漢時佛經目錄一卷
右似是明帝時迦葉摩騰創譯四十二章經
因即撰錄。
朱士行漢錄一卷
右曹魏時頴川沙門朱士行。於洛陽講道
行經因著其錄。後往西域求經。於彼而
卒。
眾經錄一卷
右西晉武帝代。長安青門外大寺西域沙
門竺法護翻譯眾經。因出其錄。
眾經錄一卷
右西晉惠帝代。永嘉中清信士聶道真稟
受護公之筆匠也。後自翻經。因出其錄。
趙錄一卷
右似是二趙時。諸錄遙注。未知姓氏。
綜理眾經目錄一卷
右符秦代沙門釋道安所撰。自前諸錄但
列經名。至於品類時代蓋闕而不紀。後人
披覽莫測根由。安乃總集名題表其時代。
銓品新舊定其制作。眾經有據自此而明。
在後群錄資而增廣。是知高懷獨悟。足以
垂範後昆。所撰之文。見僧祐錄。
二秦錄一卷
右後秦姚興弘始年。長安沙門釋僧叡所
撰。叡即安公之弟子。神用通朗思力標舉。
參譯什門多有撰緝。
眾經錄四卷(魏世錄吳世錄晉世雜錄河西錄)
右東晉廬山東林寺遠公弟子釋道流創
撰。未就而卒。同學竺道祖續而成之。
經論都錄一卷(別錄一卷)
右東晉成帝豫章山沙門支敏度撰。其人
總校古今群經故撰都錄。敏度又撰別錄
一部。
眾經目錄二卷
右蕭齊武帝時。沙門釋王宗撰。見梁三藏
記。
釋弘充錄一卷(南齊楊都人)
釋道慧宋齊錄一卷(南齊)
釋道憑錄一卷(北齊)
釋正度錄一卷
王車騎錄一卷
始興錄一卷(未詳撰者亦云南錄)
廬山錄一卷(未詳作者)
岑號錄一卷
菩提留支錄一卷(元魏洛京永寧寺天竺沙門也)
華林佛殿眾經目錄四卷(梁天監十四年勅沙門僧紹撰)
隋沙門釋靈裕譯經錄一卷(長房錄中無隋字)
眾經都錄八卷(似是總合諸家未詳作者)
已前諸錄二十五家。長房內典二錄云。上件
諸錄檢傳記有之。未見其本。故列名而已。
眾經別錄二卷(未詳作者言似宋時總分十例具如後列)
大乘經錄第一(三百七十部七百七十九卷)
三乘通教錄第二(五十一部九十七卷)
三乘中大乘錄第三(一十七部三十八卷)
右上卷三錄(總四百三十八部九百一十四卷)。
小乘經錄第四(四百三十六部六百一十卷)
第五篇目本闕(此闕本錄不顯部卷應散在諸錄中故耳)
大小乘不判錄第六(一百七十四部一百八十四卷)
疑經錄第七(一十七部二十卷)
律錄第八(一十二部一百九十五卷)
數錄第九(六部一百二十一卷)
論錄第十(六部一百五十二卷)
右下卷七錄(總六百五十一部一千六百八十二卷)。
上下兩卷合有十篇。都一千八十九部。二
千五百九十六卷(其下卷七錄部數勘同卷數 少四百未詳所以)。
元魏眾經目錄(永熈年勅舍人李廓撰一卷成)
大乘經目錄一(二百一十四部)
大乘論目錄二(二十九部)
大乘經子注目錄三(一十二部)
大乘未譯經論目錄四(二十三部)
小乘經目錄五(六十九部)
小乘論目錄六(二部)
有目未得經目錄七(一十六部)
非真經目錄八(六十二部)
非真論目錄九(四部)
全非經愚人妄作目錄十(一十一部)
都十件。經律論真偽。四百二十七部。二
千五十三卷(部數勘與都數不同賸十五部未詳所以)。
梁代眾經目錄(天監十七年勅沙門寶唱撰)
眾經目錄卷第一(大乘二百六十二部六百七十四卷)
有譯人多卷一(六十九部四百六十七卷)
無譯人多卷二(五部一十九卷)
有譯人一卷三(九十部九十卷)
無譯人一卷四(九十八部九十八卷)
眾經目錄卷第二(小乘二百八十五部四百卷)
有譯人多卷一(一十七部一百二十卷)
無譯人多卷二(五部一十七卷)
有譯人一卷三(五十部五十卷)
*Gu jing lu* (Catalogue of Ancient Sūtras), one fascicle.
The above, upon investigating various old catalogues, is often called the *Gu lu* (Ancient Catalogue). It seems to be the catalogue of sūtras brought by Shili Fang and others in the time of the First Emperor of Qin.
*Jiu jing lu* (Catalogue of Old Sūtras), one fascicle.
The above seems to be [dating from when] Liu Xiang of the Former Han collated books in the Tian Pavilion and formerly saw that there were Buddhist sūtras. It was therefore called the catalogue of an ancient cache of sūtras, referring to those concealed within the walls of Confucius's house, or those hidden among the people when the First Emperor of Qin burned the books.
*Han shi fojing mulu* (Catalogue of Buddhist Sūtras of the Han Period), one fascicle.
The above seems to have been composed on the occasion when Kāśyapa Mātanga first translated the *Sūtra of Forty-two Chapters* during the reign of Emperor Ming.
*Zhu Shixing han lu* (Zhu Shixing's Han Catalogue), one fascicle.
The above: during the Cao Wei, the śramaṇa Zhu Shixing of Yingchuan composed this catalogue while lecturing on the *Daoxing jing* in Luoyang. Later he traveled to the Western Regions in search of sūtras and died there.
*Zhongjing lu* (Catalogue of Various Sūtras), one fascicle.
The above: in the reign of Emperor Wu of the Western Jin, the Western Regions śramaṇa Dharmarakṣa translated various sūtras at the Great Monastery outside the Qing Gate of Chang'an, and subsequently produced this catalogue.
*Zhongjing lu* (Catalogue of Various Sūtras), one fascicle.
The above: in the reign of Emperor Hui of the Western Jin, during the Yongjia era, the pure-faith upāsaka Nie Daozhen, who served as the scribe receiving [translations] under Master [Dharma]rakṣa, later translated sūtras himself and subsequently produced this catalogue.
*Zhao lu* (Catalogue of the Zhao), one fascicle.
The above: it seems to date from the time of the Two Zhao. Various catalogues note it from afar, but its author's surname and given name are unknown.
*Zongli zhongjing mulu* (Comprehensive Catalogue of Various Sūtras), one fascicle.
The above was compiled by the śramaṇa Shi Dao'an during the Fu Qin. Before this, earlier catalogues merely listed the titles of sūtras, while as for categories and periods, they were completely deficient and unrecorded, so that later people perusing them could not fathom their origins. Dao'an then collected all the titles and indicated their periods, evaluated the new and old, and settled their authorship. Reliable evidence for the various sūtras became clear from this point onward. Subsequent catalogues all drew upon it and expanded it. One thus knows that his lofty mind and unique insight were well sufficient to bequeath a model to later generations. The text he compiled is seen in Sengyou's catalogue.
*Er Qin lu* (Catalogue of the Two Qin), one fascicle.
The above was compiled by the śramaṇa Shi Sengrui of Chang'an during the Hongshi era of Yao Xing of the Later Qin. Sengrui was a disciple of Master Dao'an; his mental faculties were penetrating and luminous, and his intellect was preeminent. He participated in the translations of Kumārajīva's school and produced numerous writings and compilations.
*Zhongjing lu* (Catalogue of Various Sūtras), four fascicles (*Wei shi lu* [Catalogue of the Wei Era], *Wu shi lu* [Catalogue of the Wu Era], *Jin shi za lu* [Miscellaneous Catalogue of the Jin Era], and *Hexi lu* [Catalogue of Hexi]).
The above was initially compiled by Shi Daoliu, a disciple of Master [Hui]yuan of Donglin Temple on Mount Lu in the Eastern Jin, but he died before completing it. His fellow student Zhu Daozu continued and finished it.
*Jing lun dou lu* (General Catalogue of Sūtras and Śāstras), one fascicle (*Bie lu* [Classified Catalogue], one fascicle).
The above was compiled by the śramaṇa Zhi Mindu of Mount Yuzhang during the reign of Emperor Cheng of the Eastern Jin. Because he comprehensively collated the various ancient and modern sūtras, he compiled the *Dou lu*. Mindu also compiled one copy of a *Bie lu*.
*Zhongjing mulu* (Catalogue of Various Sūtras), two fascicles.
The above was compiled by the śramaṇa Shi Wangzong during the time of Emperor Wu of the Xiao Qi. It is seen in the *Liang sanzang ji*.
*Shi Hongchong lu* (Shi Hongchong's Catalogue), one fascicle (a native of the capital Yangdu under the Southern Qi).
*Shi Daohui Song Qi lu* (Shi Daohui's Song and Qi Catalogue), one fascicle (Southern Qi).
*Shi Daoping lu* (Shi Daoping's Catalogue), one fascicle (Northern Qi).
*Shi Zhengdu lu* (Shi Zhengdu's Catalogue), one fascicle.
*Wang cheji lu* (General of Chariots and Cavalry Wang's Catalogue), one fascicle.
*Shixing lu* (Catalogue of Shixing), one fascicle (author unknown; also called the *Nan lu* [Southern Catalogue]).
*Lushan lu* (Mount Lu Catalogue), one fascicle (author unknown).
*Cen Hao lu* (Cen Hao's Catalogue), one fascicle.
*Bodhiruci lu* (Bodhiruci's Catalogue), one fascicle (he was an Indian śramaṇa of Yongning Temple in the capital Luoyang under the Northern Wei).
*Hualin fodian zhongjing mulu* (Catalogue of the Various Sūtras of the Hualin Buddha Hall), four fascicles (compiled by the śramaṇa Sengshao by imperial order in the fourteenth year of the Tianjian era of the Liang).
*Sui shamen Shi Lingyu yijing lu* (Sui Śramaṇa Shi Lingyu's Catalogue of Translated Sūtras), one fascicle (the character 'Sui' is absent in Changfang's catalogue).
*Zhongjing dou lu* (General Catalogue of Various Sūtras), eight fascicles (seems to combine various authors; author unknown).
The above twenty-five catalogues: the two catalogues of [Fei] Changfang and the *Neidian [lu]* state that when examining biographies and records, the above catalogues exist, but their texts have not been seen, and so only their titles are listed.
*Zhongjing bie lu* (Classified Catalogue of Various Sūtras), two fascicles (author unknown; said to seem to date from the Song period; divided overall into ten categories, fully listed below):
First, Catalogue of Mahāyāna Sūtras (370 works, 779 fascicles);
Second, Catalogue of Teachings Common to the Three Vehicles (51 works, 97 fascicles);
Third, Catalogue of the Mahāyāna within the Three Vehicles (17 works, 38 fascicles).
The above three catalogues comprise the upper fascicle (in total, 438 works, 914 fascicles).
Fourth, Catalogue of Hīnayāna Sūtras (436 works, 610 fascicles);
Fifth: the title is missing in the original text (this lost catalogue does not show works and fascicles; it is probably because they were scattered among the various other catalogues);
Sixth, Catalogue of Undifferentiated Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna (174 works, 184 fascicles);
Seventh, Catalogue of Suspected Sūtras (17 works, 20 fascicles);
Eighth, Catalogue of Vinaya (12 works, 195 fascicles);
Ninth, Catalogue of Numerical [Texts] (6 works, 121 fascicles);
Tenth, Catalogue of Śāstras (6 works, 152 fascicles).
The above seven catalogues comprise the lower fascicle (in total, 651 works, 1,682 fascicles).
The two fascicles, upper and lower, contain ten sections in total, amounting to 1,089 works, 2,596 fascicles (when checking the number of works in the seven catalogues of the lower fascicle, it agrees, but the number of fascicles is 400 fewer; the reason is not clear).
*Yuan Wei zhongjing mulu* (Northern Wei Catalogue of Various Sūtras) (compiled in one fascicle by the Secretariat Drafter Li Kuo by imperial order during the Yongxi era):
1. Catalogue of Mahāyāna Sūtras (214 works);
2. Catalogue of Mahāyāna Śāstras (29 works);
3. Catalogue of Sub-commentaries on Mahāyāna Sūtras (12 works);
4. Catalogue of Untranslated Mahāyāna Sūtras and Śāstras (23 works);
5. Catalogue of Hīnayāna Sūtras (69 works);
6. Catalogue of Hīnayāna Śāstras (2 works);
7. Catalogue of Sūtras Having Titles but Not Yet Obtained (16 works);
8. Catalogue of Inauthentic Sūtras (62 works);
9. Catalogue of Inauthentic Śāstras (4 works);
10. Catalogue of Delusive Fabrications by Foolish Persons Completely Non-sūtra (11 works).
In all, ten categories: authentic and spurious sūtras, vinayas, and śāstras, 427 works, 2,053 fascicles (when collating the number of works against the grand total, it does not match, exceeding it by 15 works; the reason is not clear).
*Liang dai zhongjing mulu* (Liang Dynasty Catalogue of Various Sūtras) (compiled by the śramaṇa Baochang by imperial order in the seventeenth year of the Tianjian era):
*Zhongjing mulu*, Fascicle One (Mahāyāna: 262 works, 674 fascicles):
1. Multi-fascicle with known translators (69 works, 467 fascicles);
2. Multi-fascicle without known translators (5 works, 19 fascicles);
3. Single-fascicle with known translators (90 works, 90 fascicles);
4. Single-fascicle without known translators (98 works, 98 fascicles).
*Zhongjing mulu*, Fascicle Two (Hīnayāna: 285 works, 400 fascicles):
1. Multi-fascicle with known translators (17 works, 120 fascicles);
2. Multi-fascicle without known translators (5 works, 17 fascicles);
3. Single-fascicle with known translators (50 works, 50 fascicles).
10.4.2
無譯人一卷四(二百一十三部二百一十三卷)
眾經目錄卷第三(三百六十二部一千六百八十二卷)
先異譯經一(四十五部多卷二百七十九卷三十八部一卷三十八卷)
禪經二(九部多卷三十八卷三十一部一卷三十一卷)
戒律三(六十八部二百七十三卷)
疑經四(六十二部六十七卷)
注經五(四十部二百四十六卷)
數論六(三十一部三百六十七卷)
義記七(三十八部三百四十一卷)
眾經目錄卷第四(二百二十九部九百八十五卷後部數勘欠五不同)
隨事別名一(一十三部四百一十三卷)
隨事共名二(三十五部四百七十卷)
譬喻三(一十五部三十六卷)
佛名四(一十四部二十九卷)
神呪五(四十七部四十七卷)
總四卷都二十件。凡一千四百三十三部。
三千七百四十一卷(此都部數與前數勘贍三百九十五部未詳所以)。
高齊眾經目錄(武平年沙門統法上撰梵名達摩鬱多羅一卷成)
雜藏錄一(二百九十一部八百七十四卷)
修多羅錄二(一百七十九部三百二十卷)
毘尼錄三(一十九部二百五十六卷)
阿毘曇錄四(五十部四百二十一卷)
別錄第五(三十七部七十四卷)
眾經抄錄六(一百二十七部一百三十七卷)
集錄第七(三十三部一百四十七卷)
人作錄八(五十一部一百六卷)
都八件。經律論真偽。七百八十七部。二千
三百三十四卷(此都數與前數勘欠十一卷不同未詳所以)。
從眾經別錄下四家目錄長房內典二錄
具列篇題。今尋本未獲。但具存其目。
唐眾經目錄五卷(貞觀初普光寺沙門玄琬撰出內典錄)
右內典錄中。引用云。唐舊錄未見其本。
似取隋五卷眾經錄編新經入。餘者大同。
眾經目錄五卷(於隋錄內加奘譯經餘皆無異大唐大敬愛寺沙門靜泰撰)
右從古錄已下三十一家。諸錄之中雖皆
備述。欲尋其本難可備焉。且列名題知其
有據(撰錄者曰又如長房錄中引一乘寺藏錄周錄之中引真寂寺錄義善寺錄玄法寺錄福林寺錄上
之五錄但引其名不言卷數又有陳朝大乘寺藏錄四卷並不知何人製作似是當寺藏經略記由委既扃寺名為
錄未可通行故敘錄次闕而不載)。
梁出三藏記集一十五卷(建初寺沙門釋僧祐撰)
其序略云。祐以庸淺豫憑法門。翹仰玄風
誓弘末化。每至昏曉諷持秋夏講說。未嘗
不心馳菴園影躍靈岳。於是牽課羸志
沿波討源。綴其所聞。名曰出三藏記集。一
撰緣記。二詮名錄。三總經序。四述列傳緣
記。撰則原始之本克昭名錄。詮則年代之
目不墜經序。總則勝集之時足徵列傳。述
則伊人之風可見。並鑽析內經研鏡外籍(云云)。
出三藏記集卷第一(第一卷撰緣記第二至第五詮名錄第六至第十二總經序第十三
至第十五述列傳)
集三藏緣記第一(出大智度論)
十誦律五百羅漢出三藏記第二
菩薩處胎經出八藏記第三
胡漢譯經文字音義同異記第四。應云
梵漢
前後出經異記第五
出三藏記集卷第二
新集撰出經律論錄第一(四百五十部一千八百六十七卷)
新集條解異出經錄第二(直約部名以配重譯不云卷數算極難矣)
新集表序四部律錄第三(初題有卷中無四部一百八十卷)
出三藏記集卷第三
新集安公古異經錄第一(九十二部九十二卷)
新集安公失譯經錄第二(一百四十二部一百四十七卷)
新集安公涼土異經錄第三(五十九部七十九卷)
新集安公關中異經錄第四(二十四部二十四卷)
新集律分為五部記錄第五(出毘婆沙)
新集律分為十八部記錄第六
新集律來漢地四部記錄第七
出三藏記集卷第四
新集續撰失譯雜經錄第一(一千三百六部一千五百七
十卷)
出三藏記集卷第五
新集抄經錄第一(四十六部三百五十一卷)
新集安公疑經錄第二(二十六部三十卷)
新集疑經偽撰雜錄第三(二十部二十六卷)
新集安公注經及雜經志錄第四(四十八部三百五十
九卷)
小乘迷學竺法度造異儀記第五
長安叡法師喻疑第六
Single-fascicle works with unknown translators, section 4 (213 works, 213 fascicles).
Catalogue of Scriptures, fascicle 3 (362 works, 1,682 fascicles):
1. Earlier and alternative translations of scriptures (45 multi-fascicle works, 279 fascicles; 38 single-fascicle works, 38 fascicles);
2. Dhyāna scriptures (9 multi-fascicle works, 38 fascicles; 31 single-fascicle works, 31 fascicles);
3. Vinaya rules (68 works, 273 fascicles);
4. Suspect scriptures (62 works, 67 fascicles);
5. Commentaries on scriptures (40 works, 246 fascicles);
6. Abhidharma (31 works, 367 fascicles);
7. Doctrinal treatises (38 works, 341 fascicles).
Catalogue of Scriptures, fascicle 4 (229 works, 985 fascicles; collating the count of works afterward leaves a discrepancy of five fewer):
1. Specific titles categorized by theme (13 works, 413 fascicles);
2. Common titles categorized by theme (35 works, 470 fascicles);
3. Parables (15 works, 36 fascicles);
4. Names of Buddhas (14 works, 29 fascicles);
5. Dhāraṇī mantras (47 works, 47 fascicles).
In total, four fascicles comprising twenty sections: altogether 1,433 works, 3,741 fascicles (collating this total count of works against the preceding figures shows a surplus of 395 works; the reason is unclear).
Catalogue of Scriptures of the Northern Qi (compiled in the Wuping era by the Director of Śramaṇas Fashang, whose Sanskrit name was Dharmottara; in 1 fascicle):
1. Miscellany Piṭaka Catalogue (291 works, 874 fascicles);
2. Sūtra Catalogue (179 works, 320 fascicles);
3. Vinaya Catalogue (19 works, 256 fascicles);
4. Abhidharma Catalogue (50 works, 421 fascicles);
5. Classified Catalogue (37 works, 74 fascicles);
6. Excerpts from Scriptures Catalogue (127 works, 137 fascicles);
7. Compilations Catalogue (33 works, 147 fascicles);
8. Catalogue of Works by Human Authors (51 works, 106 fascicles).
Comprising 8 sections in all: authentic and spurious sūtras, vinayas, and śāstras, numbering 787 works, 2,334 fascicles (collating this total against the preceding figures shows a discrepancy of 11 fascicles fewer; the reason is unclear).
For the four catalogues from the Classified Catalogue of Scriptures downward, Fei Zhangfang’s catalogue and the Neidian Lu give full lists of section headings; currently, search has failed to secure their full texts, so only their titles are preserved here.
Tang Catalogue of Scriptures in 5 fascicles (compiled in the early Zhenguan era by the śramaṇa Xuanwan of Puguang Temple; cited from the Neidian Lu):
Regarding the above: in the Neidian Lu it is cited as the “Old Tang Catalogue,” but its text has not been seen. It appears to take the Sui five-fascicle Catalogue of Scriptures and interpolate newly translated scriptures, the rest being broadly identical.
Catalogue of Scriptures in 5 fascicles (adding Xuanzang’s translated scriptures into the Sui catalogue, the rest being otherwise identical; compiled by the śramaṇa Jingtai of the Great Da Jing’ai Temple under the Great Tang):
Regarding the above: for the thirty-one cataloguers from the Ancient Catalogue downwards, though all are comprehensively discussed in the various catalogues, when one wishes to search for their original texts it is difficult to find them complete. Their titles are listed here merely to record that they are based on evidence. (The compiler notes: In addition, just as Zhangfang’s catalogue cites the Yicheng Temple Canon Catalogue, and the Zhou Catalogue cites the Zhenji Temple Catalogue, Yishan Temple Catalogue, Xuanfa Temple Catalogue, and Fulin Temple Catalogue—these five catalogues above are only cited by title without stating their fascicle counts; and there is also a 4-fascicle Dacheng Temple Canon Catalogue from the Chen dynasty, none of whose compilers are known. They appear to be brief inventories of the canons of those specific temples. Since their origins are confined to particular temples and their titles are monastic catalogues, they are not suitable for general circulation, and therefore in the sequence of recorded catalogues they are omitted and not recorded.)
Liang Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation in 15 fascicles (compiled by the śramaṇa Shi Sengyou of Jianchu Temple):
Its preface states in summary: “With mediocre and shallow abilities, I, Sengyou, have devoted myself to the gate of the Dharma, gazing up at the profound teaching and vowing to propagate it in this latter age. Whenever dusk or dawn arrives, reciting and upholding; throughout autumn and summer, lecturing and explaining—never has my mind not galloped to Āmrapālī's Grove, nor my shadow leaped toward the Vulture Peak. Thereupon, exerting my feeble determination, I traced the streams back to their springs, and gathered what I had heard into a work titled Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation. First, to record the accounts of origin; second, to establish the catalogue of names; third, to collect sūtra prefaces; fourth, to recount the series of biographies. Compiling the accounts of origin makes the fundamental genesis clearly evident; establishing the catalogue of names keeps the chronological records from falling into obscurity; collecting sūtra prefaces provides adequate testimony for the times of these wondrous assemblies; recounting the series of biographies allows the character of these men to be perceived. All of this is done through analyzing the inner scriptures and scrutinizing external texts, and so forth.”
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 1 (fascicle 1 compiles the accounts of origin; fascicles 2 through 5 establish the catalogue of names; fascicles 6 through 12 collect sūtra prefaces; fascicles 13 through 15 recount the series of biographies):
1. Record of the Origins of the Compilation of the Tripiṭaka (drawn from the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa);
2. Record of the Compilation of the Tripiṭaka by the Five Hundred Arhats from the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya;
3. Record of the Compilation of the Eight Piṭakas from the Bodhisattva-garbhastha-sūtra;
4. Record of Similarities and Differences in the Characters, Sounds, and Meanings of Hu and Han Translations of Scriptures (it should say ‘Fan and Han’);
5. Record of Variations Among Successive Translations of Scriptures.
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 2:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Translated Sūtras, Vinayas, and Śāstras (450 works, 1,867 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue Distinguishing Alternative Translations of Scriptures (directly coordinating re-translations merely by work title, without mentioning fascicle counts, making calculation extremely difficult);
3. Newly Compiled Catalogue Recording Prefaces to the Four Vinayas (the initial title lists fascicles, but the body does not: four divisions, 180 fascicles).
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 3:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Ancient and Atypical Scriptures of Master Dao’an (92 works, 92 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Scriptures with Anonymous Translators of Master Dao’an (142 works, 147 fascicles);
3. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Atypical Scriptures from the Liang Region of Master Dao’an (59 works, 79 fascicles);
4. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Atypical Scriptures from the Guanzhong Region of Master Dao’an (24 works, 24 fascicles);
5. Newly Compiled Record of the Division of the Vinaya into Five Sections (drawn from the Vibhāṣā);
6. Newly Compiled Record of the Division of the Vinaya into Eighteen Sections;
7. Newly Compiled Record of the Arrival of the Fourfold Vinaya in the Han Land.
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 4:
1. Newly Compiled Supplementary Catalogue of Miscellaneous Anonymous Scriptures (1,306 works, 1,570 fascicles).
Collection of Records on the Tripiṭaka's Translation, fascicle 5:
1. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Excerpted Scriptures (46 works, 351 fascicles);
2. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Suspect Scriptures of Master Dao’an (26 works, 30 fascicles);
3. Newly Compiled Miscellaneous Catalogue of Suspect and Spurious Works (20 works, 26 fascicles);
4. Newly Compiled Catalogue of Sūtra Commentaries and Miscellaneous Records of Master Dao’an (48 works, 359 fascicles);
5. Record of the Heterodox Observances Created by Zhu Fadu, a Confused Student of the Hīnayāna;
6. Dharma Master Rui of Chang’an's Clarification of Doubts.
10.4.3
出三藏記集卷第六(四十二章經序等十首)
出三藏記集卷第七(道行經序等二十首)
出三藏記集卷第八(般若鈔經序等一十九首)
出三藏記集卷第九(華嚴經記等二十四首)
出三藏記集卷第十(道地經序等二十一首)
出三藏記集卷第十一(中論序等一十六首)
出三藏記集卷第十二(雜記序錄十首)
出三藏記集卷第十三(安世高傳等十二)
出三藏記集卷第十四(鳩摩羅什傳等十)
出三藏記集卷第十五(白法祖傳等十)
(撰錄者曰。祐錄所撰條例可觀。若細尋求不無乖失。只如第一卷前後出經異記中。舊經怛薩阿竭阿羅訶三
耶三佛。新經阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者。一誤。若新舊相對應云。舊經怛薩阿竭阿羅訶三耶三佛。新經多陀阿伽度
阿羅訶三藐三佛陀。舊經阿耨多羅三耶三菩。新經阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。二義全殊不可交互。又如曇摩羅剎
與竺法護乃是一人。曇摩云法。羅剎言護。分為二人。二誤。異出經論錄中但名目相似即云重譯。而不細料簡大小
混雜。三誤。僧伽羅剎集序云眾護撰者。僧伽云眾。羅剎言護。眾護乃是集經之人。序是翻譯者作題云眾護。四誤。
此諸眾作乖謬全甚此亦璠璵之一玷也)。
隋眾經目錄七卷(一卷總錄別錄六卷開皇十四年勅翻經所法經等二十大德撰)
大乘修多羅藏錄一(六分合七百八十四部一千七百一十八卷)
眾經一譯分(合一百三十三部四百二十一卷)
眾經異譯分(合一百九十五部五百二十二卷)
眾經失譯分(合一百三十四部二百七十五卷)
眾經別生分(合二百二十一部二百六十四卷)
眾經疑惑分(合二十一部三十卷)
眾經偽妄分(合八十部一百九十六卷)
小乘修多羅藏錄二(六分合八百四十二部筭得四十五部一千三百一卷筭得三百
四卷)
眾經一譯分(合七十二部二百九十二卷)
眾經異譯分(合一百部二百七十卷)
眾經失譯分(合一百五十部二百七十二卷)
眾經別生分(合三百四十二部三百四十六卷)
眾經疑惑分(合二十九部三十一卷)
眾經偽妄分(合五十三部九十三卷)
大乘毘尼藏錄三(六分合五十部八十二卷)
眾律一譯分(合一十二部三十二卷)
眾律異譯分(合七部七卷)
眾律失譯分(合一十一部一十四卷)
眾律別生分(合一十六部一十六卷)
眾律疑惑分(合一部二卷)
眾律偽妄分(合二部一十一卷)
小乘毘尼藏錄四(六分合六十三部三百八十一卷)
眾律一譯分(合一十五部一百九十八卷)
眾律異譯分(合八部一百二十六卷)
眾律失譯分(合二十九部四十五卷)
眾律別生分(合六部六卷)
眾律疑惑分(合二部二卷)
眾律偽妄分(合三部二卷)
大乘阿毘曇藏五(六分合六十八部三百八十一卷)
眾論一譯分(合四十二部二百六卷)
眾論異譯分(合八部五十二卷)
眾論失譯分(合一部二卷)
眾論別生分(合一十五部一十九卷)
眾論疑惑分(合一部一卷)
眾論偽妄分(合一部一卷)
小乘阿毘曇藏六(六分合一百一十六部四百八十二卷)
眾論一譯分(合一十四部二百七十六卷)
眾論異譯分(合八部六十六卷)
眾論失譯分(合五部二十二卷)
眾論別生分(合八十六部一百七卷)
眾論疑惑分(合一部一卷)
眾論偽妄分(合二部一十卷)
佛滅度後抄集錄七(二分合一百四十四部六百二十七卷)
西域賢聖抄集分(合四十八部一百一十九卷)
此方諸德抄集分(合九十六部五百八卷)
佛滅度後傳記錄八(二分合六十八部一百八十五卷)
西域賢聖傳記分(合一十三部三十卷)
此方諸德傳記分(合五十五部一百五十五卷)
佛滅度後著述錄九(二分合一百一十九部一百二十卷)
西域賢聖著述分(合一十五部一十九卷)
此方諸德著述分(合一百四部一百一十五卷)
右九錄。合二千二百五十七部。五千三百
一十卷(算得二千二百五十四部五千一百九
十一卷細勘別錄部卷復與總錄不同)分為
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 6 (ten prefaces, including the preface to the Sūtra of Forty-two Chapters);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 7 (twenty prefaces, including the preface to the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 8 (nineteen prefaces, including the preface to the Prajñā Extract Sūtra);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 9 (twenty-four records, including the record of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 10 (twenty-one prefaces, including the preface to the Yogācārabhūmi-sūtra);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 11 (sixteen prefaces, including the preface to the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 12 (ten miscellaneous records and prefaces);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 13 (twelve biographies, including the biography of An Shigao);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 14 (ten biographies, including the biography of Kumārajīva);
Collection of Records of the Translation of the Tripiṭaka, Fascicle 15 (ten biographies, including the biography of Bo Fazu).
(The cataloguer says: The organizational principles of Sengyou's catalogue are worthy of consideration, yet if one investigates them in detail, errors and discrepancies are not lacking. For instance, in Fascicle 1, in the 'Record of Differences in Earlier and Later Translations of Sūtras,' equating the older sūtras' dasa'ajie aluohe sanyesanfo with the newer sūtras' anoutuoluo sanmiao sanputi is the first error. If pairing old and new opposites, one should say: the older sūtras' dasa'ajie aluohe sanyesanfo corresponds to the newer sūtras' duotuo'aqiedu aluohe sanmiao sanfoutuo, and the older sūtras' anoutuoluo sanyesanpu corresponds to the newer sūtras' anoutuoluo sanmiao sanputi. The two meanings are completely different and must not be conflated. Furthermore, Dharmarakṣa (Tanmoluoca) and Zhu Fahu are the same person—'Tanmo' means 'Fa' (Dharma), and 'Luoca' means 'Hu' (Rakṣa)—yet he splits him into two persons; this is the second error. In the catalogue of different translations of sūtras and śāstras, whenever titles merely resemble one another, he calls them re-translations, without scrutinizing them carefully, thus conflating Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna; this is the third error. The preface to the Saṅgharakṣa Compilation states that it was compiled by Zhonghu; 'Sengqie' means 'Zhong' (Saṅgha), and 'Luoca' means 'Hu' (Rakṣa). Zhonghu was the person who compiled the sūtras, but the preface was written by the translator, yet [Sengyou] attributed its title to Zhonghu; this is the fourth error. These various mistakes are exceedingly glaring; they are indeed blemishes on fine jade.)
Sui Catalogue of the Various Sūtras, 7 fascicles (1 fascicle of General Catalogue, 6 fascicles of Classified Catalogue; compiled in the fourteenth year of the Kaihuang era by imperial order by Fajing and twenty other Venerables of the translation bureau):
1. Catalogue of the Mahāyāna Sūtrapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 784 works in 1,718 fascicles):
Section of Sūtras of a Single Translation (totaling 133 works in 421 fascicles);
Section of Sūtras of Different Translations (totaling 195 works in 522 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Sūtras (totaling 134 works in 275 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Sūtras (totaling 221 works in 264 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Sūtras (totaling 21 works in 30 fascicles);
Section of Spurious Sūtras (totaling 80 works in 196 fascicles).
2. Catalogue of the Hīnayāna Sūtrapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 842 works—calculated as 45 works—in 1,301 fascicles—calculated as 304 fascicles):
Section of Sūtras of a Single Translation (totaling 72 works in 292 fascicles);
Section of Sūtras of Different Translations (totaling 100 works in 270 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Sūtras (totaling 150 works in 272 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Sūtras (totaling 342 works in 346 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Sūtras (totaling 29 works in 31 fascicles);
Section of Spurious Sūtras (totaling 53 works in 93 fascicles).
3. Catalogue of the Mahāyāna Vinayapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 50 works in 82 fascicles):
Section of Vinayas of a Single Translation (totaling 12 works in 32 fascicles);
Section of Vinayas of Different Translations (totaling 7 works in 7 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Vinayas (totaling 11 works in 14 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Vinayas (totaling 16 works in 16 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Vinayas (totaling 1 work in 2 fascicles);
Section of Spurious Vinayas (totaling 2 works in 11 fascicles).
4. Catalogue of the Hīnayāna Vinayapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 63 works in 381 fascicles):
Section of Vinayas of a Single Translation (totaling 15 works in 198 fascicles);
Section of Vinayas of Different Translations (totaling 8 works in 126 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Vinayas (totaling 29 works in 45 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Vinayas (totaling 6 works in 6 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Vinayas (totaling 2 works in 2 fascicles);
Section of Spurious Vinayas (totaling 3 works in 2 fascicles).
5. Catalogue of the Mahāyāna Abhidharmapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 68 works in 381 fascicles):
Section of Śāstras of a Single Translation (totaling 42 works in 206 fascicles);
Section of Śāstras of Different Translations (totaling 8 works in 52 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Śāstras (totaling 1 work in 2 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Śāstras (totaling 15 works in 19 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Śāstras (totaling 1 work in 1 fascicle);
Section of Spurious Śāstras (totaling 1 work in 1 fascicle).
6. Catalogue of the Hīnayāna Abhidharmapiṭaka (6 sections, totaling 116 works in 482 fascicles):
Section of Śāstras of a Single Translation (totaling 14 works in 276 fascicles);
Section of Śāstras of Different Translations (totaling 8 works in 66 fascicles);
Section of Anonymous Translations of Śāstras (totaling 5 works in 22 fascicles);
Section of Extracted Texts of Śāstras (totaling 86 works in 107 fascicles);
Section of Doubtful Śāstras (totaling 1 work in 1 fascicle);
Section of Spurious Śāstras (totaling 2 works in 10 fascicles).
7. Catalogue of Compilations and Extracts Made after the Buddha's Parinirvāṇa (2 sections, totaling 144 works in 627 fascicles):
Section of Compilations and Extracts by Sages and Worthies of the Western Regions (totaling 48 works in 119 fascicles);
Section of Compilations and Extracts by Various Worthies of this Land (totaling 96 works in 508 fascicles).
8. Catalogue of Biographies and Records Made after the Buddha's Parinirvāṇa (2 sections, totaling 68 works in 185 fascicles):
Section of Biographies and Records of Sages and Worthies of the Western Regions (totaling 13 works in 30 fascicles);
Section of Biographies and Records of Various Worthies of this Land (totaling 55 works in 155 fascicles).
9. Catalogue of Writings and Compositions Made after the Buddha's Parinirvāṇa (2 sections, totaling 119 works in 120 fascicles):
Section of Writings and Compositions by Sages and Worthies of the Western Regions (totaling 15 works in 19 fascicles);
Section of Writings and Compositions by Various Worthies of this Land (totaling 104 works in 115 fascicles).
The above nine catalogues total 2,257 works in 5,310 fascicles (calculated as 2,254 works in 5,191 fascicles; a detailed verification of the works and fascicles in the Classified Catalogue also shows discrepancies with the General Catalogue), divided into
10.4.4
六卷。總錄第七。合為七卷(撰錄者曰。余檢尋此錄。非無差
錯。即如曇摩羅剎晉言法護。總是一人。錄中分二。云各出須真天子經二卷。編為重譯。不識梵晉之言。一誤也。如
律二十二明了論。總是一經錄中分為二部。律二十二卷編在律中。明了論一卷在於是論錄。一經之題分二上
錄。二誤也。其律二十二乃是明了論半題。今云二十二卷誤之甚也。真諦攝論十二卷與十五卷者。二本不殊存
其二部而言重譯。三誤也。以仁王經起信論等編在疑錄。四誤也。不能備陳。略述如此)。
隋開皇三寶錄一十五卷(內題云歷代三寶記開皇十七年興善寺翻經學
士成都費長房撰)
歷代三寶紀第一(帝年上周秦)
從周莊王他十年甲午。至秦始皇帝子子
嬰甲午年凡二十六主四百八十一載。
歷代三寶紀第二(帝年次前漢新王後漢)
從前漢高帝元年乙未。至後漢獻帝建安
二十四年己亥。凡二十六君四百二十五
載。
歷代三寶紀第三(帝年下魏晉宋齊梁周隋)
從魏文帝黃初元年庚子。至隋開皇十七
年丁巳。凡四十四主三百七十八載。
歷代三寶紀第四(譯經後漢)
右從明帝永平十年丁卯。至獻帝末年歷
一十一主一百五十二年。華戎道俗十有
二人。并古失譯合出經律三百三十四部
四百一十六卷。
歷代三寶紀第五(譯經魏漢)
右魏吳兩代。道俗十人。所出經律羯磨并
舊失譯。合三百一十二部四百八十二卷。
歷代三寶紀第六(譯經西晉)
右西晉代。華戎道俗十有三人。并前失譯
諸經戒等。合四百五十一部七百一十七
卷。
歷代三寶紀第七(譯經東晉)
右東晉代。華戎道俗二十七人。而所出經
并舊失譯。合二百六十三部五百八十五
卷。
歷代三寶紀第八(譯經符秦姚秦)
右二秦之代。華戎釋種一十六人。合出經
論傳等一百六十四部九百四卷。
歷代三寶紀第九(譯經西秦北涼元魏高齊陳氏)
右五代。緇素共二十七人。所出三藏及記
錄等并及失譯。合二百三部八百五十五
卷。
歷代三寶紀第十(譯經宋)
右宋代。華戎道俗二十三人。出經律論及
傳錄等。凡二百一十部四百九十卷。
歷代三寶紀第十一(譯經齊梁周)
右三代。緇素共五十一人。出經律論及傳
錄等。一百六十二部一千三百二十六卷。
歷代三寶紀第十二(譯經大隋)
右隋代。華戎緇素十有九人。所翻新文及
雜舊本論傳法式。合七十五部四百六十
二卷。
歷代三寶紀第十三(大乘錄入藏目五百五十一部一千五百八十六卷)
大乘修多羅有譯一(三百三十四部八百八十五卷)
修多羅失譯二(三百三十五部四百二卷)
毘尼有譯三(一十九部四十卷)
毘尼失譯四(一十二部一十四卷)
阿毘曇有譯五(四十九部二百三十八卷)
阿毘曇失譯六(二部七卷)
歷代三寶紀第十四(小乘錄入藏目五百二十五部一千七百三十九卷錄云七百一十
二卷者誤)
小乘修多羅有譯一(一百八部五百二十七卷)
修多羅失譯二(三百一十六部四百八十二卷)
毘尼有譯三(三十九部一百八十五卷)
毘尼失譯四(三十一部六十七卷)
阿毘曇有譯五(二十一部三百五十一卷)
阿毘曇失譯六(一十部二十七卷)
開皇三寶錄總目一卷(內典錄云房錄所出經律論傳總二千一百四十六部六
千二百三十五卷非入藏數算得七十四部三十七卷與內典不同)
右兼總目共成一十五卷(其第十三十四大小乘入藏目錄合一千七十
六部二千三百二十五卷房錄本數三千三百九十二卷者計數錯也)內典錄云。房
所撰者。入藏之中瓦玉相謬。得在繁富未
可覈通。非無憑准未可偏削(撰錄者曰。余檢長房入藏錄中事實
雜謬。其闕本疑偽皆編入藏。竊為不可。又如大乘錄中賢劫經賢劫三昧經。此是一經兩名。今存二部。一誤。須
菩提品及長安品此並般若鈔之異名。今別存兩部。二誤。須真天子經須真天子問四事經亦一經兩名。重載二
[Fascicle] 6. The General Catalogue is the seventh, bringing the total to seven fascicles. (The compiler notes: Upon examining this catalogue, I find it is not without errors. For instance, Dharmarakṣa—in the Jin language, Fahu—is completely the same person, yet the catalogue divides him into two, claiming each produced a two-fascicle *Sujintianzi jing* and cataloguing them as re-translations. Failing to recognise Sanskrit and Jin words is the first error. For another example, the *Lü ershi'er mingliao lun* is entirely a single text, yet the catalogue splits it into two works: twenty-two fascicles of the *Vinaya* are catalogued under vinaya, while a one-fascicle *Mingliao lun* is placed under the catalogue of śāstras. Splitting the title of a single text into two entries in the catalogue is the second error. That 'twenty-two of the vinaya' is simply half of the title *Mingliao lun*; saying now that it is 'twenty-two fascicles' is an extreme error. Paramārtha's *Mahāyānasaṃgraha* in twelve fascicles and the one in fifteen fascicles are not different texts, yet he keeps them as two works and calls them re-translations, which is the third error. Cataloguing the *Renwang jing*, the *Awakening of Faith*, and so forth under the catalogue of doubtful texts is the fourth error. I cannot detail them all, but have briefly stated them as such.)
Sui dynasty: *Kaihuang Sanbao lu*, fifteen fascicles (its inner title is *Lidai sanbao ji*; compiled in the seventeenth year of Kaihuang by Fei Changfang of Chengdu, scholar at the translation bureau of Xingshan Temple).
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 1 (Chronology of Emperors, part 1: Zhou and Qin).
From the tenth year (*jiawu*) of King Zhuang of Zhou to the *jiawu* year of Ziying, son of the First Emperor of Qin, there were twenty-six rulers and 481 years in all.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 2 (Chronology of Emperors, part 2: Former Han, Xin-Wang, and Later Han).
From the first year (*yiwei*) of Emperor Gao of the Former Han to the twenty-fourth year (*yihai*) of the Jian'an reign of Emperor Xian of the Later Han, there were twenty-six rulers and 425 years in all.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 3 (Chronology of Emperors, part 3: Wei, Jin, Song, Qi, Liang, Zhou, and Sui).
From the first year (*gengzi*) of the Huangchu reign of Emperor Wen of Wei to the seventeenth year (*dingsi*) of the Kaihuang reign of the Sui, there were forty-four rulers and 378 years in all.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 4 (Translated Sūtras: Later Han).
The above spans from the tenth year (*dingmao*) of the Yongping reign of Emperor Ming to the final year of Emperor Xian, through eleven rulers and 152 years. Twelve people—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with ancient anonymous translations, produced a total of 334 works in 416 fascicles of sūtras and vinaya.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 5 (Translated Sūtras: Wei and Wu).
The above covers the two dynasties of Wei and Wu. Ten individuals, clergy and laity, along with former anonymous translations, produced a total of 312 works in 482 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, and karmans.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 6 (Translated Sūtras: Western Jin).
The above covers the Western Jin dynasty. Thirteen individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with previous anonymous translations of various sūtras, precepts, and so on, produced a total of 451 works in 717 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 7 (Translated Sūtras: Eastern Jin).
The above covers the Eastern Jin dynasty. Twenty-seven individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—together with old anonymous translations, produced a total of 263 works in 585 fascicles of translated sūtras.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 8 (Translated Sūtras: Fu Qin and Yao Qin).
The above covers the era of the two Qins. Sixteen individuals—Chinese and foreign of the Śākya clan—produced a total of 164 works in 904 fascicles of sūtras, śāstras, biographies, and so on.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 9 (Translated Sūtras: Western Qin, Northern Liang, Yuan Wei, Northern Qi, and Chen).
The above covers five dynasties. A total of twenty-seven people, clergy and laity, produced 203 works in 855 fascicles of the tripiṭaka, records, and so on, together with anonymous translations.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 10 (Translated Sūtras: Song).
The above covers the Song dynasty. Twenty-three individuals—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—produced a total of 210 works in 490 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, biographies, catalogues, and so on.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 11 (Translated Sūtras: Qi, Liang, and Zhou).
The above covers three dynasties. A total of fifty-one people, clergy and laity, produced 162 works in 1,326 fascicles of sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, biographies, catalogues, and so on.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 12 (Translated Sūtras: Great Sui).
The above covers the Sui dynasty. Nineteen people—Chinese and foreign, clergy and laity—translated new texts and various old versions of śāstras, biographies, and ceremonial manuals, totalling 75 works in 462 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 13 (Mahāyāna Catalogue: texts admitted into the canon, 551 works in 1,586 fascicles).
Mahāyāna sūtras with known translators, 1 (334 works in 885 fascicles);
Sūtras with anonymous translators, 2 (335 works in 402 fascicles);
Vinaya with known translators, 3 (19 works in 40 fascicles);
Vinaya with anonymous translators, 4 (12 works in 14 fascicles);
Abhidharma with known translators, 5 (49 works in 238 fascicles);
Abhidharma with anonymous translators, 6 (2 works in 7 fascicles).
*Lidai sanbao ji*, fascicle 14 (Hīnayāna Catalogue: texts admitted into the canon, 525 works in 1,739 fascicles; the catalogue's statement of 712 fascicles is an error).
Hīnayāna sūtras with known translators, 1 (108 works in 527 fascicles);
Sūtras with anonymous translators, 2 (316 works in 482 fascicles);
Vinaya with known translators, 3 (39 works in 185 fascicles);
Vinaya with anonymous translators, 4 (31 works in 67 fascicles);
Abhidharma with known translators, 5 (21 works in 351 fascicles);
Abhidharma with anonymous translators, 6 (10 works in 27 fascicles).
*Kaihuang Sanbao lu*, general table of contents, one fascicle (The *Neidian lu* states that the sūtras, vinaya, śāstras, and biographies recorded in Changfang's catalogue total 2,146 works in 6,235 fascicles; counting the works not admitted into the canon yields 74 works in 37 fascicles, which differs from the *Neidian lu*).
The above, together with the general table of contents, forms fifteen fascicles in all (its thirteenth and fourteenth fascicles, the catalogues of Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna texts admitted into the canon, total 1,076 works in 2,325 fascicles; the original number in Changfang's catalogue of 3,392 fascicles was a calculation error). The *Neidian lu* states: 'In the work compiled by Changfang, earthenware and jade are intermingled among the texts admitted into the canon. Its merit lies in its rich profusion, though it cannot be fully verified; yet it is not without grounding, and ought not to be dismissed unilaterally.' (The compiler notes: Upon examining Changfang's catalogue of texts admitted into the canon, the facts and actual contents are mixed and erroneous. Lost texts as well as doubtful and spurious ones are all catalogued as canonical, which I personally consider unacceptable. Furthermore, as in the Mahāyāna catalogue, the *Bhadrakalpika-sūtra* and *Bhadrakalpa-samādhi-sūtra* are two titles for one sūtra, yet he keeps them as two works: the first error. The *Subhūti Chapter* and *Chang'an Chapter* are both alternative titles for the *Prajñā Excerpts*, yet he preserves them separately as two works: the second error. The *Sujintianzi jing* and *Sujintianzi wen sishi jing* are also two titles for one sūtra, yet he duplicates them as two
10.4.5
部。三誤。象步經即無所希望經異名。二名各存。四誤。菩提無行經即文殊問菩提經異名。存其二本。五誤。以僧佉外
道論入大乘中。六誤。小乘錄中達摩多羅禪經與不淨觀經總是一經。其不淨觀約法為名。達摩多羅就人立
稱。二部俱存。七誤。十誦律六十一卷。十誦律五十九卷。二本不殊。其六十一卷者卑摩羅叉伽毘尼序置之於後。
餘並無異。今云重譯。二本俱存。八誤。律二十二在於律中。明了論在於論錄。一題分二。九誤。其律二十二乃是明了
論之半題。今存律二十二卷。誤中重誤也。眾事分阿毘曇論代錄之中即言宋朝求那跋陀羅共菩提耶舍譯。入藏
之內則言失源。前後差違十誤。餘者在錄。不能繁敘)。
隋眾經目錄五卷(仁壽二年勅請興善寺大德與翻經沙門及學士等撰)
都合二千一百九部五千五十九卷。
單本(原來一本更無別翻合三百七十部一千七百八十六卷)。
右第一卷。
重翻(本是一經或有二重翻者乃至六重翻者合二百七十七部五百八十三卷)。
賢聖集傳(賢聖所撰翻譯有原合四十一部一百六十四卷)。
右第二卷(已前二卷三分合六百八十八部二千五百三十三卷入藏見錄)。
別生(於本部內抄出別行合八百一十部一千二百八十八卷)。
右第三卷。
疑偽(名雖似正義涉人造合二百九部四百九十一卷)。
右第四卷(已前二卷二分合一千一十九部一千七百七十九卷不須抄寫)。
闕本(舊錄有目而無經本合四百二部七百四十七卷請訪)。
右第五卷。
其序略云。別生疑偽不須抄寫。已外三分
入藏所收。至如法寶集之。流淨住子之類。
還同略抄例入別生。餘有僧傳等。詞參文
史體非淳正。事雖可尋義無在錄。內典錄
云。即今京輦通寫盛行。直列經名仍銓傳
譯。所略過半未足撿尋(撰錄者曰。余檢尋此錄。非無差謬。只如弘道廣
顯三昧經與阿耨達龍王經。此是一經兩名。俱云竺法護譯。存其兩本。一誤。又如普曜經八卷云西晉竺法護譯。闕
本錄中復云普曜經八卷亦云竺法護譯。見闕俱載。二誤。又入藏錄中普曜經八卷即云單本。闕本錄中復云重譯。
闕本前後差舛。三誤。真諦所譯攝大乘論十二卷者與十五卷者。卷雖增減文則不殊。今二本俱存。四誤。彌沙塞羯
磨闕本錄中前後重載。五誤。以隨願往生經遺教論等編為疑偽。六誤。餘在錄中。不能備記)。
大唐內典錄十卷(麟德元年甲子西明寺沙門釋道宣撰)
歷代眾經傳譯所從錄第一(謂代別出經及人述作無非通法並入經收故
隨經出)
後漢朝傳譯道俗一十二人所出經律等
(三百三十四部四百一十六卷失譯經一百二十五部一百四十八卷)
前魏朝傳譯僧六人所出經律等(一十三部二十五卷)
南吳孫氏傳譯道俗四人所出經傳等(一百四十
八部一百九十五卷失譯經一百一十部二百九十二卷)
西晉朝傳譯道俗一十三人所出經戒等(四百
四十六部七百一十三卷失譯經八部一十五卷)
東晉朝傳譯道俗二十七人所出經傳等(二百
六十四部五百七十四卷失譯經五十部五十四卷)
前秦符氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等(四十部二百三十九
卷)
西秦乞伏氏傳譯僧一人所出經等(一十五部
二十二卷失譯經八部一十一卷)
後秦姚氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等(一百二十四部六百
七十六卷)
北涼沮渠氏傳譯道俗九人所出經傳(三十四部
二百七十卷失譯經五部一十七卷)
宋朝傳譯道俗二十四人所出經傳(二百一十七部五百
三卷)
前齊朝傳譯道俗二十人所出經傳(一十二部三百九
十六卷)
梁朝傳譯道俗二十一人所出經律傳等(八十
九部九百三卷)
後魏元氏傳譯道俗一十四人所出經論傳
錄(八十八部二百九十八卷)
後齊高氏傳譯道俗二人所出經論(八部五十二卷)
後周宇文氏傳譯道俗一十一人所出經論
天文等(三十二部一百五卷)
陳朝傳譯道俗三人所出經論傳疏等(五十四部
二百五十一卷)
texts, which is the third error. The Xiangbu jing is an alternate title for the Wusuoxingwang jing, yet both titles are retained, which is the fourth error. The Puti wuxing jing is an alternate title for the Wenshushili wen puti jing, yet both recensions are retained, which is the fifth error. Placing the Sāṃkhya non-Buddhist treatise into the Mahāyāna section is the sixth error. In the Hīnayāna catalogue, the Dharmatrāta-dhyāna-sūtra and the Fujingguan jing are fundamentally the same sūtra; the 'contemplation of impurity' is named after its method, while 'Dharmatrāta' derives its appellation from the person, yet both works are retained, which is the seventh error. The Sarvâstivāda-vinaya in sixty-one fascicles and the Sarvâstivāda-vinaya in fifty-nine fascicles are not different texts; the sixty-one-fascicle version merely placed Vimalākṣa's Vinaya preface at the end, and the remainder is completely identical, yet the catalogue calls it a retranslation and retains both recensions, which is the eighth error. The 'Vinaya in Twenty-two [Stanzas]' is placed under the vinaya section, while the Mingliao lun is placed under the śāstra section, splitting a single title into two, which is the ninth error. Furthermore, that 'Vinaya in Twenty-two' is half the title of the Mingliao lun, yet retaining it now as a 'Vinaya in twenty-two fascicles' is a repeated mistake upon a mistake. As for the Fenbie gongde lun (Abhidharma treatise of the Fenbie gongde), in the chronological dynastic catalogue it is said to have been translated under the Song dynasty by Guṇabhadra together with Bodhiyaśas, yet in the canon entry it is recorded as having an unknown origin; this discrepancy between front and back is the tenth error. The others remain in the catalogue, but cannot be recounted in full).
Sui Catalogue of Buddhist Scriptures in Five Fascicles (Compiled in the second year of Renshou by imperial decree ordering the venerable elders of Xingshan Temple along with translating śramaṇas and scholars).
Totaling 2,109 works in 5,059 fascicles.
Sole translations (originally a single text with no other translation: totaling 370 works in 1,786 fascicles).
The above is the first fascicle.
Retranslations (originally a single scripture, with some translated twice or even up to six times: totaling 277 works in 583 fascicles).
Compilations and biographies of the sages and worthies (composed by sages and worthies, whose translations have an origin: totaling 41 works in 164 fascicles).
The above is the second fascicle. (The preceding two fascicles, comprising three categories, total 688 works in 2,533 fascicles, entered into the canon and found in the catalogue).
Extracted texts (excerpts copied out from their primary works to circulate separately: totaling 810 works in 1,288 fascicles).
The above is the third fascicle.
Doubtful and spurious texts (titles may seem genuine, but their doctrinal purport involves human fabrication: totaling 209 works in 491 fascicles).
The above is the fourth fascicle. (The preceding two fascicles, comprising two categories, total 1,019 works in 1,779 fascicles, and do not need to be copied).
Lost texts (titles are in older catalogues, but no manuscripts survive: totaling 402 works in 747 fascicles, sought for inquiry).
The above is the fifth fascicle.
Its preface states in brief: 'Extracted texts and doubtful or spurious texts need not be copied; the other three categories outside of these are collected and entered into the canon. Works such as the Fabao ji and Jingzhuzi are treated like abridgments and by rule entered into the extracted texts. Remaining works such as biographies of monks contain prose mingled with civil history and are not pure in style; although their events may be investigated, their doctrinal purport does not warrant inclusion in the catalogue.' The Neidian lu states: 'At present, throughout the capital, copying flourishes widely; it merely lists scripture titles and arranges their translations, but omits more than half, making it insufficient for reference.' (The compiler says: I have examined this catalogue, and it is not without errors. For instance, the Hongdao guangxian sanmei jing and the Anavatapta-nāgarāja-sūtra are two titles for a single scripture, yet both are said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa and both texts are retained, which is the first error. Furthermore, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa of the Western Jin, but in the catalogue of lost texts, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is again said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa; recording it both as extant and lost is the second error. Again, in the catalogue of texts entered into the canon, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is called a sole translation, yet in the catalogue of lost texts it is called a retranslation; this contradiction between the extant and lost sections is the third error. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha in twelve fascicles and that in fifteen fascicles translated by Paramārtha, though varying in fascicle count, do not differ in text; yet now both recensions are retained, which is the fourth error. The Mahīśāsaka-karman is repeatedly recorded in the catalogue of lost texts, which is the fifth error. Categorizing the Suiyuan wangsheng jing and Yijiao lun as doubtful or spurious is the sixth error. The remainder in the catalogue cannot be fully noted).
Da Tang Neidian Lu in Ten Fascicles (Compiled in the first year of Linde, a jiazi year, by the śramaṇa Shi Daoxuan of Ximing Temple).
Chronological Account of the Transmission and Translation of All Scriptures from Successive Dynasties, Part 1 (referring to texts produced in individual dynasties and works composed by people, all of which convey the Dharma and are collected into the scriptures, hence they are set forth alongside the scriptures):
Twelve persons, both clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Later Han dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, etc. produced by them (334 works in 416 fascicles; anonymous translations: 125 works in 148 fascicles).
Six monks who transmitted and translated in the Former Wei dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, etc. produced by them (13 works in 25 fascicles).
Four persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Southern Wu of the Sun clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (148 works in 195 fascicles; anonymous translations: 110 works in 292 fascicles).
Thirteen persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Western Jin dynasty, and the scriptures, precepts, etc. produced by them (446 works in 713 fascicles; anonymous translations: 8 works in 15 fascicles).
Twenty-seven persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Eastern Jin dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (264 works in 574 fascicles; anonymous translations: 50 works in 54 fascicles).
Eight monks who transmitted and translated in the Former Qin of the Fu clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (40 works in 239 fascicles).
One monk who transmitted and translated in the Western Qin of the Qifu clan, and the scriptures, etc. produced by him (15 works in 22 fascicles; anonymous translations: 8 works in 11 fascicles).
Eight monks who transmitted and translated in the Later Qin of the Yao clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (124 works in 676 fascicles).
Nine persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Liang of the Juqu clan, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (34 works in 270 fascicles; anonymous translations: 5 works in 17 fascicles).
Twenty-four persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Song dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (217 works in 503 fascicles).
Twenty persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Former Qi dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (12 works in 396 fascicles).
Twenty-one persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Liang dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, biographies, etc. produced by them (89 works in 903 fascicles).
Fourteen persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Later Wei of the Yuan clan, and the scriptures, treatises, biographies, catalogues produced by them (88 works in 298 fascicles).
Two persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Qi of the Gao clan, and the scriptures, treatises produced by them (8 works in 52 fascicles).
Eleven persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Zhou of the Yuwen clan, and the scriptures, treatises, astronomy, etc. produced by them (32 works in 105 fascicles).
Three persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Chen dynasty, and the scriptures, treatises, biographies, commentaries, etc. produced by them (54 works in 251 fascicles).
10.4.6
隋朝傳譯道俗二十五人所出經論等(一百六部
六百三十三卷)
皇朝傳譯僧等十有二人所出經論等(一百一十
七部一千六百六十八卷)
都合一十八代。所出眾經。總有二千四百
八十七部。八千四百七十六卷(其第一卷初都數與第十
卷中都數多少不同又與諸本對勘數亦少多差別未詳何者為正)。
已上一錄分為五卷(從第一至第五)。
歷代翻本單重人代存亡錄第二(謂前後異出人代不同又遭離
亂道俗波迸今總計會故有單重緣敘莫知致傳失譯)
大乘經單重譯本并譯有無錄(合三百八十六部一千一百五
十二卷一萬八千五百二十二紙)
大乘律單重譯本并譯有無錄(合二十二部三十四卷)
大乘論單重譯本并譯有無錄(合七十二部五百卷九千二百
二十紙)
小乘經單重譯本并譯有無錄(合二百四部五百四十四卷七
千六百七十四紙)
小乘律本譯有無錄(合三十五部二百七十四卷五千八百一十三紙)
小乘論單重譯本并譯有無錄(合三十三部六百七十六卷一
萬二千一百七十七紙)
賢聖集錄通大小乘(合四十七部一百八十四卷二千七百六十紙)
右一錄分為第六第七二卷。
歷代眾經分乘入藏錄第三(謂經部繁多綱要備列從帙入藏以類相從故
分大小二乘顯單重兩譯)
眾經律論傳(合八百一部三千三百六十一卷五萬六千一百七十紙三百二十六帙)
大乘經一譯(二百四部六百八十五卷一萬一千四十三紙六十六帙)
大乘經重翻(二百二部四百九十七卷七千二百九十紙四十九帙)
小乘經一譯(一百八部四百三十五卷六千六百九十紙三十九帙)
小乘經重翻(九十六部一百一十四卷九百七十七紙六帙)
小乘律(三十五部二百七十四卷五千八百一十三紙二十八帙)
大乘論(七十四部五百二卷九千一百三十紙五十二帙)
小乘論(三十三部六百七十六卷一萬二千一百七十七紙六十八帙)
賢聖集傳(四十九部一百八十四卷二千八十四紙一十八帙)
右一錄為第八卷(撰錄者曰尋此錄數與次前錄部卷有同者有不同者前
錄出大乘律此合入經中又單重交雜前後差舛憑何准定)。
歷代眾經舉要轉讀錄第四(謂轉讀尋翫務在要博繁文重義非曰被時故
隨部撮舉簡取通道自餘重本存而未暇)
大乘經正本(二百五十四部七百九十五卷一萬三千七十九紙)
大乘律本(二十部三十二卷四百三十紙)
大乘論本(六十三部四百四十五卷八千一百一十五紙)
都合大乘經律論合三百三十七部。一千
二百六十七卷(二萬一千六百二十五紙)。
小乘經(合一百一十八部四百三十三卷六千七百一十三紙)
小乘律(合三十五部二百七十四卷五千七百一十八紙)
小乘論(合二十九部五百六十五卷九千九百九十七紙)
都合小乘經律論。合一百八十二部。一千
二百五十二卷(二萬二千四百二十八紙)。
賢聖集傳(合四十三部一百七十七卷二千九百九十七紙)
右一錄為第九卷(撰錄者曰尋此中意上所列者是轉讀數諸重譯經但存一本餘並
義理無異刪而不存)。
歷代眾經有目闕本錄第五(謂統檢群錄校本則無隨方別出未能通遍故
別顯目訪之)
歷代道俗述作注解錄第六(謂注述聖言用通未悟前已雜顯未足申明今
別題錄使尋覽易曉)
歷代諸經支流陳化錄第七(謂別生諸經典順時俗未通廣本且
接初心一四句頌未可輕削故也)
歷代所出疑偽經論錄第八(謂正法深遠凡愚未達隨俗下化有勃真宗
若不標顯玉石斯濫)
歷代眾經錄目始終序第九(謂經錄代出須識其源)
歷代眾經應感興敬錄第十(謂經翻東夏應感徵祥而有蒙祐增信故使
傳持惟遠)
右六錄合為第十卷(欲具委之恐繁故略)。
內典錄中。宣律師云。余少沐法流五十餘
載。宗匠成教軌範賢明。每值經誥德能無
不目閱親謁。至於經部大錄欣悟良多。無
論真偽思聞其異(云云)故魏晉之後。騰譯欝
蒸製錄討論居然非一。或以數列。或用名
Sūtras, śāstras, and other works produced by twenty-five translators, clergy and laity, during the Sui dynasty (106 works, 633 fascicles);
Sūtras, śāstras, and other works produced by twelve translators, monks and others, during the present imperial dynasty (117 works, 1,668 fascicles).
In total, for all eighteen eras, the sūtras and other works produced amount altogether to 2,487 works, 8,476 fascicles (the total count at the beginning of the first fascicle differs from the total count in the tenth fascicle, and when collated against other editions there are also minor discrepancies; it is not yet clear which is correct).
The above single catalogue is divided into five fascicles (from the first to the fifth).
Second: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Translated Texts, Sole and Multiple, with the Translators' and Dynasties' Extant or Lost Status (meaning that different translations were produced at earlier and later times under different dynasties, and having suffered through disorders and upheavals, clergy and laity were scattered; now summing them up, there are sole and multiple translations, yet the circumstances of their transmission are obscure, leading to anonymous translations).
Catalogue of Sole and Multiple Translations of Mahāyāna Sūtras with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 386 works, 1,152 fascicles, 18,522 sheets);
Catalogue of Sole and Multiple Translations of Mahāyāna Vinayas with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 22 works, 34 fascicles);
Catalogue of Sole and Multiple Translations of Mahāyāna Śāstras with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 72 works, 500 fascicles, 9,220 sheets);
Catalogue of Sole and Multiple Translations of Hīnayāna Sūtras with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 204 works, 544 fascicles, 7,674 sheets);
Catalogue of Hīnayāna Vinayas with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 35 works, 274 fascicles, 5,813 sheets);
Catalogue of Sole and Multiple Translations of Hīnayāna Śāstras with Translators Extant or Lost (in total, 33 works, 676 fascicles, 12,177 sheets);
Catalogue of Compilations by Worthies and Saints, Spanning Both Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna (in total, 47 works, 184 fascicles, 2,760 sheets).
The above single catalogue is divided into the sixth and seventh fascicles.
Third: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Canonical Texts Classified by Vehicle and Entered into the Canon (meaning that because the scriptural works are voluminous, their essential outlines are fully set forth, following cases and entering the canon grouped by category; hence, they are divided into the two vehicles of Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna, showing both sole and multiple translations).
Sūtras, vinayas, śāstras, and biographical accounts (in total, 801 works, 3,361 fascicles, 56,170 sheets, 326 cases);
Mahāyāna sūtras in a single translation (204 works, 685 fascicles, 11,043 sheets, 66 cases);
Mahāyāna sūtras in retranslations (202 works, 497 fascicles, 7,290 sheets, 49 cases);
Hīnayāna sūtras in a single translation (108 works, 435 fascicles, 6,690 sheets, 39 cases);
Hīnayāna sūtras in retranslations (96 works, 114 fascicles, 977 sheets, 6 cases);
Hīnayāna vinayas (35 works, 274 fascicles, 5,813 sheets, 28 cases);
Mahāyāna śāstras (74 works, 502 fascicles, 9,130 sheets, 52 cases);
Hīnayāna śāstras (33 works, 676 fascicles, 12,177 sheets, 68 cases);
Compilations and biographical accounts of worthies and saints (49 works, 184 fascicles, 2,084 sheets, 18 cases).
The above single catalogue forms the eighth fascicle (The cataloguer remarks: "Examining the counts in this catalogue, some agree with the works and fascicles in the preceding catalogue while others differ. The preceding catalogue separately listed Mahāyāna vinayas, but here they are merged into the sūtras; moreover, sole and multiple translations are mixed together and inconsistent from beginning to end. On what basis can they be definitively settled?").
Fourth: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Canonical Texts with Key Works Selected for Chanting and Study (meaning that for chanting, reading, study, and perusal, the emphasis is on concision and comprehensiveness; voluminous text and redundant meanings are not suited to the times; therefore, selecting and extracting according to works, it chooses those that communicate the Path, while leaving the remaining duplicate versions preserved without immediate attention).
Primary texts of Mahāyāna sūtras (254 works, 795 fascicles, 13,079 sheets);
Texts of Mahāyāna vinayas (20 works, 32 fascicles, 430 sheets);
Texts of Mahāyāna śāstras (63 works, 445 fascicles, 8,115 sheets);
In total, Mahāyāna sūtras, vinayas, and śāstras amount to 337 works, 1,267 fascicles (21,625 sheets);
Hīnayāna sūtras (in total, 118 works, 433 fascicles, 6,713 sheets);
Hīnayāna vinayas (in total, 35 works, 274 fascicles, 5,718 sheets);
Hīnayāna śāstras (in total, 29 works, 565 fascicles, 9,997 sheets);
In total, Hīnayāna sūtras, vinayas, and śāstras amount to 182 works, 1,252 fascicles (22,428 sheets);
Compilations and biographical accounts of worthies and saints (in total, 43 works, 177 fascicles, 2,997 sheets).
The above single catalogue forms the ninth fascicle (The cataloguer remarks: "Examining the intent here, what is listed above are counts for chanting and reading. For all sūtras with multiple translations, only one version is preserved, and the rest, having no difference in meaning or principle, have been excised and not retained").
Fifth: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Canonical Texts with Titles but Lost Texts (meaning that when comprehensively checking the various catalogues, the texts are missing when collating; having been produced separately across different regions, they could not circulate everywhere; therefore, their titles are separately displayed to search for them).
Sixth: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Treatises and Commentaries by Clergy and Laity (meaning that they annotate and explicate the sacred words to make them accessible to those who have not yet understood; earlier they were displayed in a mixed manner, which was not sufficient to elucidate them clearly; now their titles are recorded separately to make them easy to understand upon perusal).
Seventh: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Branch Streams of Sūtras Deployed for Transformation (meaning the various extracted texts; adapting to worldly customs, when they had not yet grasped the broad texts, they temporarily received beginners; even a single four-line verse should not be lightly excised, and this is the reason).
Eighth: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Doubtful and Spurious Sūtras and Śāstras (meaning that the true Dharma is profound and far-reaching, and ordinary, ignorant people do not comprehend it; accommodating vulgar practices down below, they violate the authentic tradition; if they are not clearly identified, jade and stone will be commingled).
Ninth: Preface on the Beginnings and Ends of Successive Dynasties' Scriptural Catalogues (meaning that scriptural catalogues were produced dynasty by dynasty, and one must know their origins).
Tenth: Catalogue of Successive Dynasties' Canonical Texts Responding to Sentiments and Inspiring Reverence (meaning that when sūtras were translated into the Eastern Xia, they responded with auspicious signs, and there was received protection that increased faith; thus, causing transmission and preservation to last long into the future).
The above six catalogues are combined into the tenth fascicle (as wishing to detail them fully might prove overly verbose, they are abridged).
In the Neidian lu, Vinaya Master Xuan says: "In my youth I bathed in the stream of Dharma, for over fifty years. The masters of the lineage established the teachings, exemplary and wise. Whenever I encountered scriptural proclamations or virtuous capabilities, there were none I did not personally read and visit. As for the great catalogues of scriptural divisions, I rejoiced and comprehended exceedingly. Regardless of authentic or spurious, I wished to hear their differences [and so forth]. Therefore, after the Wei and Jin dynasties, translations flourished vigorously, and composing catalogues and discussing them was by no means solitary. Some arranged by number, some used titles..."
First 6 of 12 passages. Read on
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation