開元釋教錄 14.7.3

14.7.3

難品異譯。今闕此經（舊經在第六卷新經在第十三）。
菩薩本業經一卷（是華嚴淨行品亦直云本業經）東晉天竺三
藏佛陀跋陀羅譯（第三譯）
右兼本品前後五譯。四本在藏一本闕（其舊華嚴
經既是覺賢所譯。不合別出此本業經。以大周錄入藏中有未見其本。且此述之。又長房錄中支謙再出淨行
品經者誤也。其淨行經脚注云。一名菩薩本業經）。
菩薩十法住經二卷（是十住品）西晉清信士聶道
真譯（第三譯）
右兼本品前後五譯。四本在藏一本闕（長房等錄
更有菩薩十住經一卷。云是東晉佛陀跋陀羅譯。詳其覺賢既譯大本。不合別出此經。房錄誤也）。
十住經十二卷（是十地品）西晉清信士聶道真譯
（第二譯）
右兼本品前後五譯。四本在藏一本闕。
羅摩伽經三卷（是入法界品少分）曹魏西域三藏安法
賢譯（第一譯）
羅摩伽經一卷（是入法界品少分）北涼天竺三藏曇無
讖譯（第四譯）
右兼本品前後五譯。三本在藏二本闕
從入如來智不思議經下一十二部二十
七卷。華嚴部中闕本。
梵般泥洹經二卷（舊錄云胡般今改為梵字或一卷）後漢月支
三藏支婁迦讖譯（第一譯）
大般涅槃經二卷曹魏外國三藏安法賢略
前品為二卷（第二譯）
大般泥洹經二卷吳優婆塞支謙譯序品哀
歎品為二卷（第三譯）
般泥洹經二十卷北涼雍州沙門智猛於涼
州譯（第六譯）
右兼涅槃大本及新譯後分前後七譯。三
本在藏四本闕（又大周錄中指竺道祖錄云。東晉義熈十三年佛陀跋陀羅於道場寺
譯大般泥洹經一卷。或云十卷。是大本前分十卷。盡大眾問品今尋諸錄及傳記等。其法顯譯。大般泥洹亦
是義熙十三年於道場寺譯。其法顯所出諸經並與覺賢共譯。諸錄題注多相參涉。時處既同必非再出。今
合為一更不別存）。
從梵般泥洹經下四部二十六卷涅槃部中
闕本。
蜀普曜經八卷失譯（似是蜀土所出在魏吳錄第一譯）
普曜經八卷（或六卷或五卷）宋沙門智嚴共寶雲
譯（第三譯）
右二經與方廣莊嚴經同本。前後四譯。二
存二闕。
無量義經一卷宋天竺三藏求那跋陀羅譯
（第一譯）
右一經前後兩譯。一存一闕。
法華三昧經六卷（一本加正字）吳外國三藏支彊
良接譯（出翻經圖第一譯）
薩芸芬陀利經六卷西晉三藏竺法護太始
年譯（第二譯。謹按長房等錄。其正法華是竺法護。太康七年譯。見聶道真錄復云太始
元年譯。薩芸芬陀利經六卷。出竺道祖錄同是一經不合再出。名目既殊本復存沒。未詳所以。或可薩
芸芬陀利是梵語。正法華是晉名。梵晉俱存。錄家誤也）
方等法華經五卷東晉沙門支道根譯（第四
譯）
右三經同本。兼及添品前後六譯。三存三
闕。
佛以三車喚經一卷吳月支優婆塞支謙譯
右一經出法華經中異譯。應是譬喻品。
古維摩詰經二卷後漢臨淮沙門嚴佛調譯
（第一譯）
異毘摩羅詰經三卷（祐云異維摩詰。或作思字或二卷）西晉
西域優婆塞竺叔蘭譯（第三譯）
維摩詰所說法門經一卷（或云維摩詰經）西晉三藏竺
法護譯（第四譯謹按僧祐錄中更有刪維摩詰經一卷。亦云竺法護譯。下注云祐意謂先出
維摩繁重護刪出逸偈也。今意與前無異故不別存。又周錄中更有毘摩羅詰經二卷。亦云吳黃武年
支謙譯。出長房錄撿長房錄無此經名。周錄誤也）
維摩詰經四卷東晉西域三藏祇多蜜譯（第
五譯）
右四經同本。前後七譯。三存四闕（其西晉沙
門支敏度。合一支兩竺三本共為五卷者以非別翻又闕其本故不存之）。
大方等頂王經一卷姚秦三藏鳩摩羅什譯
（第二譯）
右一經前後四譯。三存一闕。
閑居經十卷西晉三藏竺法護譯（第一譯）
悲華經十卷北涼沙門釋道龔譯（第三譯）
右二經同本。前後四譯。二存二闕。
佛昇忉利天為母說法經一卷宋罽賓三藏
曇摩蜜多譯（第三譯）
右一經前後三譯。二存一闕。
大乘寶雲經八卷陳扶南國沙門須菩提譯
（第二譯）

…different translation of the Nan chapter. This sūtra is now lost (in the old sūtra it is in the sixth fascicle, in the new sūtra in the thirteenth).
*Bodhisattva-benye jing* in one fascicle (this is the "Jingxing pin" ["Purification of Practice" Chapter] of the *Avataṃsaka*; also called simply *Benye jing*), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Buddhabhadra of India under the Eastern Jin (third translation).
The above, together with the root chapter, has five translations in all: four texts are in the canon and one is lost. (Since the old *Avataṃsaka-sūtra* was translated by Buddhabhadra [Juexian], it is not appropriate to list this *Benye jing* separately. Because the Great Zhou Catalogue entered it into the canon, yet the text has not been seen, it is temporarily recorded here. Furthermore, Fei Changfang's catalogue records Zhi Qian as having made a second translation of the *Jingxing pin jing*, which is an error; the note to that *Jingxing jing* states: "Also named *Pusa benye jing*.")
*Pusa shifazhu jing* in two fascicles (this is the "Shizhu pin" ["Ten Abodes" Chapter]), translated by the Upāsaka Nie Daozhen under the Western Jin (third translation).
The above, together with the root chapter, has five translations in all: four texts are in the canon and one is lost. (In the catalogues of Fei Changfang and others, there is also a *Pusa shizhu jing* in one fascicle, which is said to have been translated by Buddhabhadra under the Eastern Jin. Examining this: since Buddhabhadra already translated the large text, it is not appropriate to list this sūtra separately; Changfang's catalogue is mistaken.)
*Shizhu jing* in twelve fascicles (this is the "Shidi pin" ["Ten Stages" Chapter]), translated by the Upāsaka Nie Daozhen under the Western Jin (second translation).
The above, together with the root chapter, has five translations in all: four texts are in the canon and one is lost.
*Luomojia jing* in three fascicles (this is a small portion of the "Ru fajie pin" ["Entering the Dharma Realm" Chapter]), translated by Tripiṭaka Master An Faxian of the Western Regions under the Cao Wei (first translation).
*Luomojia jing* in one fascicle (this is a small portion of the "Ru fajie pin" ["Entering the Dharma Realm" Chapter]), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Dharmakṣema of India under the Northern Liang (fourth translation).
The above, together with the root chapter, has five translations in all: three texts are in the canon and two are lost.
From the *Ru rulai zhi busiyiyi jing* downwards: twelve works in twenty-seven fascicles; lost texts in the Avataṃsaka section.
*Fan ban nihuan jing* in two fascicles (the old catalogues say *Hu ban*; this has now been changed to the character *Fan*; or in one fascicle), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Lokakṣema of the Yuezhi under the Later Han (first translation).
*Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra* in two fascicles: Tripiṭaka Master An Faxian of foreign lands under the Cao Wei abridged the earlier chapters into two fascicles (second translation).
*Da ban nihuan jing* in two fascicles: Upāsaka Zhi Qian of Wu translated the "Introductory Chapter" and the "Lamentation Chapter" into two fascicles (third translation).
*Ban nihuan jing* in twenty fascicles, translated by Śramaṇa Zhimeng of Yongzhou in Liangzhou under the Northern Liang (sixth translation).
The above, together with the large text of the *Nirvāṇa* and the newly translated Latter Portion, has seven translations in all: three texts are in the canon and four are lost. (Furthermore, the Great Zhou Catalogue cites Zhu Daozu's catalogue, stating: "In the thirteenth year of the Yixi reign of the Eastern Jin [417 CE], Buddhabhadra translated the *Da ban nihuan jing* in one fascicle—or said to be ten fascicles—at Daochang Temple; this is the first ten fascicles of the large text, down through the 'Chapter on the Questions of the Great Assembly.'" Now, investigating the various catalogues, biographies, and accounts: Faxian's translation of the *Da ban nihuan* was also translated in the thirteenth year of Yixi at Daochang Temple. The various scriptures translated by Faxian were all co-translated with Buddhabhadra [Juexian]; the headings and notes of the various catalogues largely overlap. Since the time and place are the same, it was certainly not an independent re-translation. They are now combined into one and not preserved separately.)
From the *Fan ban nihuan jing* downwards: four works in twenty-six fascicles; lost texts in the Nirvāṇa section.
*Shu puyao jing* in eight fascicles: anonymous translation (it appears to have been produced in the region of Shu; in the Wei and Wu catalogues; first translation).
*Puyao jing* in eight fascicles (or in six fascicles, or five fascicles), translated by the Śramaṇas Zhiyan and Baoyun under the Song (third translation).
The above two sūtras are different translations of the same text as the *Lalitavistara* (*Fangguang zhuangyan jing*). There were four translations in all: two survive and two are lost.
*Wuliangyi jing* in one fascicle, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Guṇabhadra of India under the Song (first translation).
The above one sūtra has two translations in all: one survives and one is lost.
*Fahua sanmei jing* in six fascicles (one edition adds the character *Zheng*), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Zhi Jiangliangjie of foreign lands under the Wu (drawn from the *Fanyi tu*; first translation).
*Sayunfentuoli jing* in six fascicles, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Dharmarakṣa under the Western Jin in the Taishi reign (second translation. Respectfully examining the catalogues of Fei Changfang and others: the *Zheng fahua* was translated by Dharmarakṣa in the seventh year of Taikang. Looking at Nie Daozhen's catalogue, it further states that the *Sayunfentuoli jing* in six fascicles was translated in the first year of Taishi, drawn from Zhu Daozu's catalogue. These are the same scripture and should not be recorded twice. Given that the titles differ and that one text is extant while the other is lost, the reason is not yet clear. Perhaps *Sayunfentuoli* is Sanskrit, and *Zheng fahua* is the Jin translation: both the Sanskrit and Jin names being preserved, the cataloguers erred).
*Fangdeng fahua jing* in five fascicles, translated by Śramaṇa Zhi Daogen under the Eastern Jin (fourth translation).
The above three sūtras are different translations of the same text; together with the *Tianpin*, there were six translations in all: three survive and three are lost.
*Fo yi sanche huan jing* in one fascicle, translated by Upāsaka Zhi Qian of the Yuezhi under the Wu.
The above one scripture is an extracted translation from the *Lotus Sūtra*; it must be the "Parable Chapter."
*Gu Weimojie jing* in two fascicles, translated by Śramaṇa Yan Fotiao of Linhuai under the Later Han (first translation).
*Yi Weimolajie jing* in three fascicles (Sengyou gives *Yi Weimojie*; or with the character *Si*; or in two fascicles), translated by Upāsaka Zhu Shulan of the Western Regions under the Western Jin (third translation).
*Weimojieshuo famen jing* in one fascicle (or called *Weimojie jing*), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Dharmarakṣa under the Western Jin (fourth translation. Respectfully examining Sengyou's catalogue, there is also a *Shan Weimojie jing* in one fascicle, also said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa; the note below states that Sengyou believed the earlier translation of the *Vimalakīrti* was cumbersome, and Dharmarakṣa abridged it and brought out the omitted verses. My present view does not differ from the former, so it is not separately preserved. Furthermore, in the Zhou Catalogue there is also a *Weimolajie jing* in two fascicles, also said to have been translated by Zhi Qian of the Wu during the Huangwu reign, drawn from Fei Changfang's catalogue; checking Changfang's catalogue, there is no such scripture title; the Zhou Catalogue is mistaken).
*Vimalakīrti-sūtra* in four fascicles, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Jiduomi of the Western Regions under the Eastern Jin (fifth translation).
The above four scriptures are different translations of the same text. There were seven translations in all: three survive and four are lost. (As for Śramaṇa Zhi Mindu of the Western Jin combining the three editions of one Zhi and two Zhus into five fascicles: because it was not a separate translation, and the text is also lost, it is not preserved here).
*Dafangdeng dingwang jing* in one fascicle, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Kumārajīva under the Later Qin (second translation).
The above one scripture has four translations in all: three survive and one is lost.
*Xianju jing* in ten fascicles, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Dharmarakṣa under the Western Jin (first translation).
*Karuṇāpuṇḍarīka-sūtra* (*Beihua jing*) in ten fascicles, translated by Śramaṇa Shi Daogong under the Northern Liang (third translation).
The above two scriptures are different translations of the same text. There were four translations in all: two survive and two are lost.
*Fo sheng daolitian wei mu shuofa jing* in one fascicle, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Dharmamitra of Jibin under the Song (third translation).
The above one scripture has three translations in all: two survive and one is lost.
*Mahāyāna-ratnamegha-sūtra* (*Dacheng baoyun jing*) in eight fascicles, translated by Śramaṇa Subhūti of Funan under the Chen (second translation).