開元釋教錄 16.7.4

16.7.4

Pusa liufa xing jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Pusa zhu kuxing jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; sometimes without the character zhu; just over four sheets; newly compiled above);
Pusa he shuimian jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Pusa he jia guo jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Anan jian shuiguang rui jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Qi'e zhangzhe wen pusa fa jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Tuoluoni jie jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Liu jing jing, one fascicle (Master Daoan says: extracted from the Vinayapiṭaka; listed among anonymous translations; eight and a half sheets; newly compiled above);
Pusa deng ru fayan jing, one fascicle (sometimes without the word pusa; listed in Master Daoan's catalogue under anonymous translations; five sheets; newly compiled above);
Pusa benyuan xing pin jing, one fascicle (Sengyou's catalogue says: an extract; newly compiled above);
Tonghao foming jing, one fascicle (three sheets; newly compiled above);
Sanshi fa jing, one fascicle (sometimes written with the character chi; two sheets; newly compiled above).
Regarding the ten works including the Sanshiqi pin, Sengyou's catalogue states they are extracts without specifying their sources. Among them, upon inspecting the text of the Pusa zhu kuxing jing, it is unquestionably an extract, yet it is still unknown from which sūtra or vinaya it derives. As for the four works including the Liu jing, I have now inspected their original texts, and they are indeed extracted texts. Furthermore, in the Sui Renshou Catalogue of Buddhist Scriptures, there are altogether one hundred and seventeen works in one hundred and thirty-seven fascicles of Mahāyāna extracted texts which also do not indicate their sources. Now, upon examining the catalogues of various dynasties, most have already been recorded. Its treating texts such as the Hu zhu tongzi jing and Tuolinbo jing as extracted texts is unwarranted. Since there is no reliable evidence, they can hardly be depended on. Having briefly described them as above, the remainder are deleted and not recorded.