Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

貞元新定釋教目錄 18.4.5

English (machine translation) 18.4.5

Language
English

18.4.5

at the end, but the rest are completely identical. Now saying they are retranslations and retaining both texts is the eighth error. The Vinaya in Twenty-Two [Stanzas] is placed among the vinayas, while the Treatise Clarifying the Tenets (Vimokṣamārga / Saṃmatīyaśāstra) is placed in the catalogue of treatises; splitting one title into two is the ninth error. The 'Vinaya in Twenty-Two [Stanzas]' is merely half the title of the Treatise Clarifying the Tenets; now preserving it as 'Vinaya in twenty-two fascicles' is an error piled upon an error. In the chronological catalogue, the Prakaraṇāryavācā-abhidharma-śāstra is said to have been translated jointly by Guṇabhadra and Bodhiyaśas under the Song dynasty, but in the canon catalogue it is stated that the translator's provenance is lost; this inconsistency between before and after is the tenth error. The others remain in the catalogue; they cannot be recounted in full).
Sui Catalogue of Canonical Scriptures in five fascicles (Compiled in the second year of Renshou by imperial order requesting the venerable elders of Xingshan Monastery along with translation śramaṇas, scholars, etc.)
Totaling 2,109 works (in 5,059 fascicles).
Single translations (originally having one Indic text with no other translations): totaling 370 works in 1,786 fascicles.
The first fascicle above.
Retranslations (originally being one scripture, but having two translations or even up to six retranslations): totaling 277 works in 583 fascicles.
Anthologies and biographies of sages and saints (authored by sages and saints, with known translation provenances): totaling 41 works in 164 fascicles.
The second fascicle above (The three sections of the preceding two fascicles total 688 works in 2,533 fascicles, entered into the canon as extant entries).
Extracts (excerpted from the main works to circulate separately): totaling 810 works in 1,288 fascicles.
The third fascicle above.
Suspected and spurious works (whose titles seem orthodox, but whose doctrines show human fabrication): totaling 209 works in 491 fascicles.
The fourth fascicle above.
Missing texts (listed in old catalogues but without extant scripture texts): totaling 402 works in 747 fascicles (searches requested).
The fifth fascicle above.
Its preface states in brief: Extracts and suspected and spurious works need not be copied; the remaining three sections are included in the canon. As for works such as the Fabao ji (Collection of the Dharma Jewel) and the Jingzhu zi (Pure Abiding), they are treated as abridged excerpts and classified as extracts. Others, such as the biographies of monks, contain literary and historical language and are not of pure doctrinal form; although their events can be investigated, in meaning they have no place in the catalogue. The Neidian lu states: they are currently transcribed everywhere and widely circulated in the capital; simply listing the titles of the scriptures while still evaluating the translations, it omits more than half and is not worthy of examination. (The compiler says: When I examine this catalogue, it is not without errors. For instance, the Hongdao guangxian sanmei jing and the Anavatapta-nāgarāja-sūtra are two titles for one scripture, both said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa; preserving both texts is the first error. Furthermore, the Puyao jing in eight fascicles is said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa of the Western Jin, but in the catalogue of missing texts it again lists the Puyao jing in eight fascicles, also said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa; recording it in both the extant and missing sections is the second error. Furthermore, within the canon the Puyao jing in eight fascicles is called a single translation, but in the catalogue of missing texts it is called a retranslation; this discrepancy between before and after regarding missing texts is the third error. The She dacheng lun (Mahāyānasaṃgraha) translated by Paramārtha in twelve fascicles and the one in fifteen fascicles: although the fascicle counts differ, the text is not different; now preserving both texts is the fourth error. The Mahīśāsaka-karmavācanā is recorded repeatedly before and after in the catalogue of missing texts; this is the fifth error. Classifying texts such as the Suiyuan wangsheng jing and the Yijiao lun (Commentary on the Buddha's Bequest) as suspected and spurious is the sixth error. Others remain in the catalogue; they cannot be recorded in full).
Great Tang Catalogue of Buddhist Texts in ten fascicles (Compiled in the first year of Linde, jiazi, by the śramaṇa Shi Daoxuan of Ximing Monastery)
Catalogue 1: Chronological Provenances of the Translation of the Various Scriptures across the Dynasties (meaning the scriptures translated across the dynasties as well as the treatises and compositions by individuals, none of which fail to propagate the Dharma and are all included under the scriptures; hence they are presented along with the scriptures).
Scriptures, vinayas, etc. translated under the Later Han dynasty by twelve individuals, both monastic and lay (334 works in 416 fascicles; 102 scriptures with lost translators in 148 fascicles).
Scriptures, vinayas, etc. translated under the Later Han dynasty by six monks (13 works in 25 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Sun Wu of the south by four individuals, both monastic and lay (148 works in 195 fascicles; 110 scriptures with lost translators in 292 fascicles).
Scriptures, precepts, etc. translated under the Western Jin dynasty by thirteen individuals, both monastic and lay (446 works in 713 fascicles; 8 scriptures with lost translators in 15 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Eastern Jin dynasty by twenty-seven individuals, both monastic and lay (264 works in 574 fascicles; 50 scriptures with lost translators in 54 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Former Qin of the Fu clan by eight monks (40 works in 239 fascicles).
Scriptures, etc. translated under the Western Qin of the Qifu clan by one monk (15 works in 22 fascicles; 8 scriptures with lost translators in 12 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Later Qin of the Yao clan by eight monks (124 works in 676 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Northern Liang of the Juqu clan by nine individuals, both monastic and lay (34 works in 270 fascicles; 5 scriptures with lost translators in 17 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Song dynasty by twenty-four individuals, both monastic and lay (217 works in 503 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Former Qi dynasty by twenty individuals, both monastic and lay (52 works in 396 fascicles).
Scriptures, vinayas, biographies, etc. translated under the Liang dynasty by twenty-one individuals, both monastic and lay (89 works in 903 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, and biographies translated under the Later Wei of the Yuan clan by fourteen individuals, both monastic and lay (88 works in 298 fascicles).
Scriptures translated under the Northern Qi of the Gao clan by two individuals, both monastic and lay (8 works in 52 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, astronomical works, etc. translated under the Northern Zhou of the Yuwen clan by eleven individuals, both monastic and lay (32 works in 105 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, biographies, commentaries, etc. translated under the Chen dynasty by three individuals, both monastic and lay (54 works in 251 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, etc. translated under the Sui dynasty by twenty-five individuals, both monastic and lay (106 works in 633 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, etc. translated under the Imperial [Tang] dynasty by twelve individuals, both monastic and lay.
Totaling 2,487 works in 8,476 fascicles of various scriptures produced across the eighteen dynasties (The total count at the beginning of the first fascicle differs from the total count in the tenth fascicle; moreover, collating with various editions reveals slight discrepancies, and it is not clear which is correct).
The single catalogue above is divided into five fascicles (from the first to the fifth).
Catalogue 2: Chronological Catalogue of Extant and Lost Single and Retranslated Versions and Their Translators across Dynasties (referring to translations produced at different times across different eras and whether they survived

Linked texts (1)