貞元新定釋教目錄 18.4.5

18.4.5

於後。餘並無異。今云重譯。二本俱存。八誤。律二十二在於律中。明了論在於論錄。一題分二。九誤。其律二十二
乃是明了論之半題。今存律二十二卷。誤中重誤也。眾事分阿毘曇論代錄之中即言宋朝求那跋陀羅共菩提
耶舍譯。入藏之內則言失源。前後差違。十誤。餘者存錄。不能繁敘）。
隋眾經目錄五卷（仁壽二年勅請興善寺大德與翻經沙門及學士等撰）
都合二千一百九部（五千五十九卷）。
單本（原來一本更無別翻）合三百七十部一千七百八十
六卷。
右第一卷。
重翻（本是一經或有二翻者乃至六重翻者）合二百七十七部五百
八十三卷。
賢聖集傳（賢聖所撰翻譯有原）合四十一部一百六十四卷。
右第二卷（已前二卷三分合六百八十八部二千五百三十三卷入藏見錄）。
別生（於本部內抄出別行）合八百一十部一千二百八十八
卷。
右第三卷。
疑偽（名雖似正義涉人造）合二百九部四百九十一卷。
右第四卷。
闕本（舊錄有目而無經本）合四百二部七百四十七卷（請訪）。
右第五卷。
其序略云。別生疑偽不須抄寫。已外三分
入藏所收。至如法寶集之流。淨住子之類
還同略抄例入別生。餘有僧傳等詞參文
史體非淳正。事雖可尋義無在錄。內典錄
云。即今京輦通寫盛行。直列經名仍銓傳
譯。所略過半未足尋之（撰錄者曰。余撿尋此錄。非無差謬。只如弘道
廣顯三昧經與阿耨達龍王經。此是一經兩名。俱云竺法護譯。存其兩本。一誤。又如普曜經八卷云西晉竺法護譯。
闕本錄中復云普曜經八卷亦云竺法護譯。見闕俱載。二誤。又入藏中普曜經八卷即云單本。闕本錄中即
云重譯。闕本前後差舛。三誤。真諦所譯攝大乘論十二卷者與十五卷者。卷雖增減文則不殊。今二本俱存。四誤。彌
沙塞羯磨闕本錄中前後重載。五誤。以隨願往生經遺教論等編為疑偽。六誤。餘在錄中。不能備記）。
大唐內典錄十卷（麟德元年甲子西明寺沙門釋道宣撰）
歷代眾經傳譯所從錄第一（謂代別出經及人述作無非通法並入經收
故隨經出）。
後漢朝傳譯道俗十二人所出經律等（三百三十
四部四百一十六卷失譯經一百二部一百四十八卷）。
後漢朝傳譯僧六人所出經律等（一十三部二十五卷）
南吳孫氏傳譯道俗四人所出經傳等（一百四十
八部一百九十五卷失譯經一百一十部二百九十二卷）。
西晉朝傳譯道俗一十三人所出經戒等
（四百四十六部七百一十三卷失譯經八部十五卷）。
東晉朝傳譯道俗二十七人所出經傳等
（二百六十四部五百七十四卷失譯經五十部五十四卷）。
前秦苻氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等（四十部二百三十九
卷）。
西秦乞伏氏傳譯僧一人所出經等（一十五部二十二卷
失譯經八部一十二卷）。
後秦姚氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等（一百二十四部六百
七十六卷）。
北涼沮渠氏傳譯道俗九人所出經傳
（三十四部二百七十卷失譯經五部一十七卷）。
宋朝傳譯道俗二十四人所出經傳（二百一十七部五百
三卷）。
前齊朝傳譯道俗二十人所出經傳（五十二部三百九十
六卷）。
梁朝傳譯道俗二十一人所出經律傳等
（八十九部九百三卷）。
後魏元氏傳譯道俗一十四人所出經論
傳（八十八部二百九十八卷）。
後齊高氏傳譯道俗二人所出經（八部五十二卷）。
後周宇文氏傳譯道俗一十一人所出經
論天文等（三十二部一百五卷）。
陳朝傳譯道俗三人所出經論傳疏等（五十四部
二百五十一卷）。
隋朝傳譯道俗二十五人所出經論等（一百六部
六百三十三卷）。
皇朝傳譯道俗等十有二人所出經論等。
都合一十八代所出眾經總有二千四百八
十七部八千四百七十六卷（其第一卷初都數與第十卷中都數
多少不同又與諸本對勘數亦少多差互未詳何者為正）。
已上一錄分為五卷（從第一至第五）。
歷代翻本單重人代存亡錄第二（謂前後異出人代不同又遭離

at the end, but the rest are completely identical. Now saying they are retranslations and retaining both texts is the eighth error. The Vinaya in Twenty-Two [Stanzas] is placed among the vinayas, while the Treatise Clarifying the Tenets (Vimokṣamārga / Saṃmatīyaśāstra) is placed in the catalogue of treatises; splitting one title into two is the ninth error. The 'Vinaya in Twenty-Two [Stanzas]' is merely half the title of the Treatise Clarifying the Tenets; now preserving it as 'Vinaya in twenty-two fascicles' is an error piled upon an error. In the chronological catalogue, the Prakaraṇāryavācā-abhidharma-śāstra is said to have been translated jointly by Guṇabhadra and Bodhiyaśas under the Song dynasty, but in the canon catalogue it is stated that the translator's provenance is lost; this inconsistency between before and after is the tenth error. The others remain in the catalogue; they cannot be recounted in full).
Sui Catalogue of Canonical Scriptures in five fascicles (Compiled in the second year of Renshou by imperial order requesting the venerable elders of Xingshan Monastery along with translation śramaṇas, scholars, etc.)
Totaling 2,109 works (in 5,059 fascicles).
Single translations (originally having one Indic text with no other translations): totaling 370 works in 1,786 fascicles.
The first fascicle above.
Retranslations (originally being one scripture, but having two translations or even up to six retranslations): totaling 277 works in 583 fascicles.
Anthologies and biographies of sages and saints (authored by sages and saints, with known translation provenances): totaling 41 works in 164 fascicles.
The second fascicle above (The three sections of the preceding two fascicles total 688 works in 2,533 fascicles, entered into the canon as extant entries).
Extracts (excerpted from the main works to circulate separately): totaling 810 works in 1,288 fascicles.
The third fascicle above.
Suspected and spurious works (whose titles seem orthodox, but whose doctrines show human fabrication): totaling 209 works in 491 fascicles.
The fourth fascicle above.
Missing texts (listed in old catalogues but without extant scripture texts): totaling 402 works in 747 fascicles (searches requested).
The fifth fascicle above.
Its preface states in brief: Extracts and suspected and spurious works need not be copied; the remaining three sections are included in the canon. As for works such as the Fabao ji (Collection of the Dharma Jewel) and the Jingzhu zi (Pure Abiding), they are treated as abridged excerpts and classified as extracts. Others, such as the biographies of monks, contain literary and historical language and are not of pure doctrinal form; although their events can be investigated, in meaning they have no place in the catalogue. The Neidian lu states: they are currently transcribed everywhere and widely circulated in the capital; simply listing the titles of the scriptures while still evaluating the translations, it omits more than half and is not worthy of examination. (The compiler says: When I examine this catalogue, it is not without errors. For instance, the Hongdao guangxian sanmei jing and the Anavatapta-nāgarāja-sūtra are two titles for one scripture, both said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa; preserving both texts is the first error. Furthermore, the Puyao jing in eight fascicles is said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa of the Western Jin, but in the catalogue of missing texts it again lists the Puyao jing in eight fascicles, also said to have been translated by Dharmarakṣa; recording it in both the extant and missing sections is the second error. Furthermore, within the canon the Puyao jing in eight fascicles is called a single translation, but in the catalogue of missing texts it is called a retranslation; this discrepancy between before and after regarding missing texts is the third error. The She dacheng lun (Mahāyānasaṃgraha) translated by Paramārtha in twelve fascicles and the one in fifteen fascicles: although the fascicle counts differ, the text is not different; now preserving both texts is the fourth error. The Mahīśāsaka-karmavācanā is recorded repeatedly before and after in the catalogue of missing texts; this is the fifth error. Classifying texts such as the Suiyuan wangsheng jing and the Yijiao lun (Commentary on the Buddha's Bequest) as suspected and spurious is the sixth error. Others remain in the catalogue; they cannot be recorded in full).
Great Tang Catalogue of Buddhist Texts in ten fascicles (Compiled in the first year of Linde, jiazi, by the śramaṇa Shi Daoxuan of Ximing Monastery)
Catalogue 1: Chronological Provenances of the Translation of the Various Scriptures across the Dynasties (meaning the scriptures translated across the dynasties as well as the treatises and compositions by individuals, none of which fail to propagate the Dharma and are all included under the scriptures; hence they are presented along with the scriptures).
Scriptures, vinayas, etc. translated under the Later Han dynasty by twelve individuals, both monastic and lay (334 works in 416 fascicles; 102 scriptures with lost translators in 148 fascicles).
Scriptures, vinayas, etc. translated under the Later Han dynasty by six monks (13 works in 25 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Sun Wu of the south by four individuals, both monastic and lay (148 works in 195 fascicles; 110 scriptures with lost translators in 292 fascicles).
Scriptures, precepts, etc. translated under the Western Jin dynasty by thirteen individuals, both monastic and lay (446 works in 713 fascicles; 8 scriptures with lost translators in 15 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Eastern Jin dynasty by twenty-seven individuals, both monastic and lay (264 works in 574 fascicles; 50 scriptures with lost translators in 54 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Former Qin of the Fu clan by eight monks (40 works in 239 fascicles).
Scriptures, etc. translated under the Western Qin of the Qifu clan by one monk (15 works in 22 fascicles; 8 scriptures with lost translators in 12 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Later Qin of the Yao clan by eight monks (124 works in 676 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Northern Liang of the Juqu clan by nine individuals, both monastic and lay (34 works in 270 fascicles; 5 scriptures with lost translators in 17 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Song dynasty by twenty-four individuals, both monastic and lay (217 works in 503 fascicles).
Scriptures, biographies, etc. translated under the Former Qi dynasty by twenty individuals, both monastic and lay (52 works in 396 fascicles).
Scriptures, vinayas, biographies, etc. translated under the Liang dynasty by twenty-one individuals, both monastic and lay (89 works in 903 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, and biographies translated under the Later Wei of the Yuan clan by fourteen individuals, both monastic and lay (88 works in 298 fascicles).
Scriptures translated under the Northern Qi of the Gao clan by two individuals, both monastic and lay (8 works in 52 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, astronomical works, etc. translated under the Northern Zhou of the Yuwen clan by eleven individuals, both monastic and lay (32 works in 105 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, biographies, commentaries, etc. translated under the Chen dynasty by three individuals, both monastic and lay (54 works in 251 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, etc. translated under the Sui dynasty by twenty-five individuals, both monastic and lay (106 works in 633 fascicles).
Scriptures, treatises, etc. translated under the Imperial [Tang] dynasty by twelve individuals, both monastic and lay.
Totaling 2,487 works in 8,476 fascicles of various scriptures produced across the eighteen dynasties (The total count at the beginning of the first fascicle differs from the total count in the tenth fascicle; moreover, collating with various editions reveals slight discrepancies, and it is not clear which is correct).
The single catalogue above is divided into five fascicles (from the first to the fifth).
Catalogue 2: Chronological Catalogue of Extant and Lost Single and Retranslated Versions and Their Translators across Dynasties (referring to translations produced at different times across different eras and whether they survived