金剛般若經旨贊 2.103

2.103

經。何以故至則非菩薩　贊曰。此顯無所伏也。先徵後釋。所住若無妄心寧有。若亦無妄所伏亦無。既有所伏妄心明有所相。而言無所度者。何以故耶。故即答云亦無所伏。若諸菩薩謂有我等是所伏者則非菩薩。見有我等則不能伏。不伏我等是凡夫故。

Sūtra: "Why is this?... [he is] then not a bodhisattva." / Commentary: This reveals that there is nothing to subdue. First he poses the question and then explains it. If that in which one abides is nonexistent, how could an errant mind exist? If there is also no error, then that which is subdued is also nonexistent. Since there is something subdued, the errant mind clearly has a sign; but as for saying there is no one delivered, why is this so? Hence, he replies that there is also nothing to be subdued. If bodhisattvas think that an ego and so forth are that which is subdued, they are not bodhisattvas. Seeing an ego and so forth, they cannot subdue it; those who do not subdue the ego and so forth are ordinary beings.