律戒本疏 1.122

1.122

六十九以無根謗他僧殘犯墮　慈地前以四重誣陀標。二謗不成。今又此謗之。因是結戒。凡以無根殘法謗不淨比丘。十一種犯　五種不犯。十一種犯者。若不見不聞不疑。若見忘聞忘疑忘。若聞信。若聞不信。聞之已言見。疑已言聞。是名十一種犯。五種不犯者。是事若見若聞若疑。見已不忘。聞已不忘。是名五種不犯。不淨比丘清淨比丘亦如是。無根謗清淨比丘十種犯。除見忘餘如上。四種不犯。除見忘餘如上。清淨比丘似不清淨亦如是也。

69. Falsely defaming another [monk] with a groundless saṃghāvaśeṣa is an offense of pāyattika. Earlier, Mettiya falsely accused Dabba of a fourfold grave [offense]. The two slanderous charges failed. Now, he defamed him with this [saṃghāvaśeṣa]. On this account, the precept was formulated. In general, defaming an impure monk with a groundless saṃghāvaśeṣa offense involves eleven offenses and five non-offenses. The eleven offenses are: if one has not seen, heard, or suspected; if one has seen and forgotten, heard and forgotten, or suspected and forgotten; if one has heard and believes it; if one has heard and does not believe it; having heard it, one says one saw it; having suspected it, one says one heard it—these are called the eleven offenses. The five non-offenses are: this matter is either seen, heard, or suspected; having seen it, one has not forgotten; having heard it, one has not forgotten—these are called the five non-offenses. With an impure monk or a pure monk, it is also like this. Groundlessly defaming a pure monk involves ten offenses; except for 'having seen and forgotten', the rest are as above. Four are non-offenses; except for 'having seen and forgotten', the rest are as above. A pure monk who seems not to be pure is also like this.