律戒本疏 1.46

1.46

二十五與他比丘衣後瞋故自奪教人奪　往昔一時佛欲遊行。跋難陀作是念言。佛從大眾衣食難供。若我隨行不得隨意。今當在先無求不足。先施弟子衣與而無。要後欲將行。弟子不從便奪弟子。弟子不還。遂強逼奪令其怨恨。因是結戒。不聽悔奪。若先與意了後奪犯重。未了而奪師捨墮。弟子不還犯重。戒文後言。是比丘應比丘前捨。謂弟子應捨還師。律師云。所誦戒無諸比丘前四字。未詳有者意。然依文亦以有義也。

Twenty-five: Giving a robe to another monk and later, out of anger, snatching it back oneself or having someone snatch it back. Once in the past, the Buddha wished to go on a walking tour. Upananda thought: 'The Buddha is accompanied by a great assembly; robes and food will be hard to provide. If I follow along, I will not be able to have my way. Now I should go ahead, so that whatever I seek will not be lacking.' He had previously given a robe to a disciple without conditions. Later, when he wanted to take him along on the journey and the disciple would not comply, he snatched the robe from the disciple. The disciple would not return it, so he forcibly snatched it, causing him resentment. On account of this, [the Buddha] formulated the precept: regretting and snatching back is not permitted. If one had previously given it with clear intention and later snatches it back, one commits a grave offense. If the intention was not finalized and he snatches it back, the master commits a forfeiture and pāyattika; if the disciple does not return it, he commits a grave offense. Later in the precept text it says: 'This monk should forfeit it before the monks,' which means that the disciple should forfeit and return it to the master. The Vinaya master says: 'In the recited precepts, there are no four characters