律戒本疏 1.66

1.66

十三不隨問答惱他　闡陀犯戒。人教令悔。答言。噵誰有罪耶。我不信。君能說我罪。佛令眾僧與闡陀作白二憶念羯磨。令諸比丘憶念其過。以此罰之。如闡陀比丘亦應如是治之。因是制戒。若以作憶念。以異事惱他犯墮。若未作憶念羯磨。用異事惱他突。闡陀後更有罪。諸比丘諫之。默然不答。亦為作白二憶念羯磨。羯磨竟用默然惱他亦犯墮。未羯磨惱他突。若病若驚畏故默然無犯。若入上坐房衣服不正。上坐語之。默然不答。若上坐不喜故入其房。如是比丘凡不順他意。令其心惱悉犯。如此戒上坐犯下坐不辭謝犯吉羅也。

Thirteenth: Afflicting another by evasive speech—Channa broke the precepts, and someone instructed him to repent. He replied: 'Who says there is an offense? I do not believe that you are capable of speaking of my offense.' The Buddha ordered the saṃgha to perform a jñaptidvitīyā smṛti-vinaya karma for Channa, causing all the monks to bring to mind his faults so as to punish him with this. Monks like Channa should also be dealt with in this way. Because of this, the precept was instituted. If, after the smṛti-vinaya has been performed, one afflicts another with extraneous matters, it is a pāyattika; if the smṛti-vinaya karma has not yet been performed and one afflicts another with extraneous matters, it is a duṣkṛta. Later, Channa committed further offenses. The monks admonished him, and he remained silent without answering. They also performed a jñaptidvitīyā smṛti-vinaya karma for him. After the karma was finished, if he afflicted others by means of silence, it was also a pāyattika; before the karma, afflicting others was a duṣkṛta. If due to illness or fright he remains silent, there is no offense. If entering a senior monk's room with robes untidy, and the senior monk speaks to him, he remains silent and does not answer; or if because the senior monk is displeased he enters his room—for such a monk, generally, not complying with another's intention and causing affliction to his mind is entirely an offense; under such a precept, if a senior monk commits it against a junior monk, not apologizing is a duṣkṛta.