瑜伽師地論分門記 1.113

1.113

十一明無因見論分三。一立彼宗見。二廣破邪宗。三總結　初文分三。一明起論因分二。一依靜慮。二依尋思。二明立論因由分二。一問。二答分五。一依見事差別。二依見無果。三依風。四依河。五依果木。三結　二廣破邪宗分二。一依無體我破分二。一問。二破分二。一依無體。二依念我。二依內外物破分二。一問。二破分二。一依無因分三。一無種種生過。二無欻然而起過。三無有時不生過。二依有因　第三總結分四。一結無體。二結念我。三結無因。四結有因。

Eleventh, explaining the doctrine of views of causelessness has three parts: 1. establishing their school's view; 2. broadly refuting the heterodox school; 3. general conclusion.

The first section has three parts: 1. explaining the cause giving rise to the doctrine, in two parts: (1) relying on dhyāna, and (2) relying on discursive thought; 2. explaining the reasons for establishing the doctrine, which has two parts: (1) question, and (2) answer in five parts: relying on seeing differences in matters, relying on seeing no result, relying on the wind, relying on rivers, and relying on fruit trees; 3. conclusion.

Second, broadly refuting the heterodox school has two parts: 1. refutation relying on the self lacking substantial entity, in two parts: (1) question, and (2) refutation in two parts: relying on lacking substantial entity, and relying on mindfulness of the self; 2. refutation relying on internal and external objects, in two parts: (1) question, and (2) refutation in two parts: [a] relying on lack of cause, in three parts: the fault of lacking diverse arising, the fault of lacking sudden occurrence, and the fault of lacking times of non-arising; [b] relying on having a cause.

Third, the general conclusion has four parts: 1. concluding the lack of substantial entity; 2. concluding mindfulness of the self; 3. concluding the lack of cause; 4. concluding having a cause.