Viyahapannatti 30.1.1000

30.1.1000

anaṃtarovavannagā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! neraiyā kiṃ kiriyāvādī–pucchā|
goyamā! kiriyāvādī vi jāva veṇaiyavādī vi|
salessā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā kiṃ kiriyāvādī? evaṃ ceva|
evaṃ jaheva paḍhamuddese neraiyāṇaṃ vattavvayā taheva iha vi bhāṇiyavvā, navaraṃ–jaṃ jaṃ atthi anaṃtarovavannagāṇaṃ neraiyāṇaṃ taṃ taṃ bhāṇiyavvaṃ| evaṃ savvajīvāṇaṃ jāva vemāṇiyāṇaṃ, navaraṃ–anaṃtarovavannagāṇaṃ jaṃ jahiṃ atthi taṃ tahiṃ bhāṇiyavvaṃ|
kiriyāvādī ṇaṃ bhaṃte! anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā kiṃ neraiyāuyaṃ pakareṃti–pucchā|
goyamā! no neraiyāuyaṃ pakareṃti, no tirikkhajoṇiyāuyaṃ, no manussāuyaṃ, no devāuyaṃ pakareṃti| evaṃ akiriyāvādī vi annāṇiyavādī vi veṇaiyavādī vi|
salessā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiriyāvādī anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā kiṃ neraiyāuyaṃ pakareṃti–pucchā|
goyamā! no neraiyāuyaṃ pakareṃti jāva no devāuyaṃ pakareṃti| evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyā| evaṃ savvaṭṭhāṇesu vi anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā na kiṃci vi āuyaṃ pakareṃti jāva anāgārovauttatti| evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyā, navaraṃ–jaṃ jassa atthi taṃ tassa bhāṇiyavvaṃ|
kiriyāvādī ṇaṃ bhaṃte! anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā kiṃ bhavasiddhīyā? abhavasiddhīyā?
goyamā! bhavasiddhīyā, no abhavasiddhīyā|
akiriyāvādī ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! bhavasiddhīyā vi, abhavasiddhīyā vi| evaṃ annāṇiyavādī vi veṇaiyavādī vi|
salessā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiriyāvādī anaṃtarovavannagā neraiyā kiṃ bhavasiddhīyā? abhavasiddhīyā?
goyamā! bhavasiddhīyā, no abhavasiddhīyā| evaṃ eeṇaṃ abhilāveṇaṃ jaheva ohie uddesae neraiyāṇaṃ vattavvayā bhaṇiyā taheva iha vi bhāṇiyavvā jāva anāgārovauttatti|
evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyāṇaṃ, navaraṃ–jaṃ jassa atthi taṃ tassa bhāṇiyavvaṃ| ima se lakkhaṇaṃ–je kiriyāvādī sukkapakkhiyā sammāmicchadiṭṭhīyā ee savve bhavasiddhīyā, no abhavasiddhīyā| sesā savve bhavasiddhīyā vi, abhavasiddhīyā vi|
sevaṃ bhaṃte! sevaṃ bhaṃte! tti|

"Venerable Sir! Are immediately reborn inhabitants of hell kriyāvādins?"—[this is] the question.
"Gautama! They are kriyāvādins as well, up to vainayikavādins as well."
"Venerable Sir! Are immediately reborn inhabitants of hell who possess lesyā kriyāvādins?" The same indeed.
Just as the exposition of inhabitants of hell was stated in the first uddeśaka, so should it be stated here too; with the only difference: whatever pertains to immediately reborn inhabitants of hell, that should be stated. In this way for all jīvas up to celestial beings of the vimānas; with the only difference: whatever pertains to the immediately reborn wherever, that should be stated there.
"Venerable Sir! Do immediately reborn inhabitants of hell who are kriyāvādins bind the lifespan of inhabitants of hell?"—[this is] the question.
"Gautama! They do not bind the lifespan of inhabitants of hell, nor of animals, nor of humans, nor do they bind the lifespan of gods." So also the akriyāvādins, ajñānikavādins, and vainayikavādins.
"Venerable Sir! Do immediately reborn inhabitants of hell who possess lesyā and are kriyāvādins bind the lifespan of inhabitants of hell?"—[this is] the question.
"Gautama! They do not bind the lifespan of inhabitants of hell, up to they do not bind the lifespan of gods. In this way up to celestial beings of the vimānas. In this way in all states too, immediately reborn inhabitants of hell do not bind any lifespan at all, up to those with formless application [of consciousness]. In this way up to celestial beings of the vimānas; with the only difference: whatever belongs to which, that should be stated for that.
"Venerable Sir! Are immediately reborn inhabitants of hell who are kriyāvādins capable of liberation (bhavasiddhika) or incapable of liberation (abhavasiddhika)?"
"Gautama! They are capable of liberation, not incapable of liberation."
"Akriyāvādins?"—[this is] the question.
"Gautama! They are capable of liberation as well, and incapable of liberation as well. So also ajñānikavādins and vainayikavādins."
"Venerable Sir! Are immediately reborn inhabitants of hell who possess lesyā and are kriyāvādins capable of liberation or incapable of liberation?"
"Gautama! They are capable of liberation, not incapable of liberation. In this phrasing, just as the exposition of inhabitants of hell was stated in the general uddeśaka, so should it be stated here too, up to those with formless application [of consciousness].
In this way up to celestial beings of the vimānas; with the only difference: whatever belongs to which, that should be stated for that. This is its distinguishing characteristic: those who are kriyāvādins, belonging to the bright fortnight, and having right-and-wrong view—all these are capable of liberation, not incapable of liberation. All the rest are capable of liberation as well, and incapable of liberation as well."
"That is so, Venerable Sir! That is so, Venerable Sir!"