A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c30.434

v2.c30.434

695 See Ca.Ci.25.110–111 (pralepa instead of ālepana). Cf. Ca.Ci.25.41. 696 See Ca.Ci.25.110, where the terms śaithilya and saukumārya are employed instead of mārdava. 697 See Ca.Ci.25.113. 698 See Ca.Ci.25.115–117. 699 See Ca.Ci.25.118. 700 Cf. Su.Ci.1.8. 701 See on the influence of āyurvedic drugs on wound healing: K. Amrut Kumar Chand, T.C. Jain and Kulwant Singh (1989); P.J. Deshpande, S.N. Pathak and J.D. Gode (1970); P.J. Deshpande, S.N. Pathak and P.S. Shankaran (1965); P.V. Diwan, L.D. Tilloo and D.R. Kulkarni (1982); L.P. Gupta and K.N. Udupa (1977); I.S. Rao and P.J. Deshpande (1968); C.L. Yadav and C.S. Yadav (1985). See on āyurvedic antimicrobial drugs: A. Banerjee and S.S. Nigam (1977), (1978); A.P. Basu (1973); D.S. Bhakuni et al. (1969), (1971); S.S. Bhatnagar et al. (1961); I.C. Chopra and C.L. Chopra (1959); I.C. Chopra, K.C. Gupta and B.N. Nazir (1952); M.L. Dhar et al. (1968); A. Eppler (1995); K.N. Gaind and S.C. Bapna (1967); K.N. Gaind and R.D. Budhiraja (1967); M. George and K.M. Pandalai (1949); M.P. Goutam and R.M. Purohit (1978); K.C. Gupta and I.C. Chopra (1953a); N.H. Khan, M. Rahman and M.S.A. Nur-e-Kamal (1988); L. Lillykutty and G. Santhakumari (1969); C.S. Mathela and G.K. Sinha (1978); J.M. van der Nat (1989): 47–48; R.P. Patel et al. (1964); R.P. Patel and A.S. Dantwala (1958); R.P. Patel and K.C. Patel (1956), (1957); R.P. Patel and B.M. Trivedi (1957), (1962); Pratap Singh, G.K. Sinha and R.C. Pathak (1978); P.G. Ray and S.K. Majumdar (1976); D.V.K. Rao et al. (1986); B.M. Singh, G. Nath and R.D. Sharma (1995); J. Singh et al. (1991); P.P. Singh et al. (1987); U.M. Thatte and S.A. Dahanukar (1989). See on treatment according to the Siddha system: T.G. Ramamurthi Iyer (1930a). 702 See on the kṣīrivṛkṣa (nyagrodhādi) and balādi groups of drugs (mentioned at 25.63) in the Carakasamhitā: P.V. Sharma (1985g): 57 and 59. Compare Ca.Ci.25.69 and Su.Sū.18.19–21; 25.87 and Su.Sū.37.22; 25.96ab and Su.Sū.18.16; 25.96cd and Su.Sū.18.18; 25.115–118 and Su.Sū.17.17–18. Compare on the treatment of vraṇa: Bhela Ci.27. 703 The term pāka has many meanings which makes it difficult to translate; it designates digestion, transformation of bodily constituents, maturation, cooking, the formation of pus, etc. The same semantic indecisiveness and inconsistency of the Greek medical terms pepsis and sepsis testify to theories which are still in flux (see M.D. Grmek, 1991: 124; R. Wittern, 1974). The terms pakva and apakva are of great importance, not only in āyurveda, but in Indian culture in general, in particular with relation to food. See on this subject: L. Dumont (1966): 179–189; R.S. Khare (1976): 1–27; Ch. Malamoud (1996): 51–53; D.C. Tabor (1981). See on the opposition raw-cooked in other cultures: C. Lévi-Strauss (1964). 704 Cf. Su.Sū.5.5. Jejjata and Cakra remark that the surgical measures enumerated in the tisraiṣaṇīya chapter (Ca.Sū.11.55) are included in this series of six types. 705 Compare bhedana at Ca.Sū.11.55 706 Also mentioned at Ca.Sū.11.55. 707 Also mentioned at Ca.Sū.11.55. 708 Also mentioned at Ca.Sū.11.55. 709 Also mentioned at Ca.Sū.11.55. 710 Also mentioned at Ca.Sū.11.55. 711 Cf. Su.Sū.25.3–17ab.