A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c30.971

v2.c30.971

(R.K. Sharma and Bhagwan Dash, 1976: Preface XXXIX to Vol. I of their ed. and transl. of the Carakasamhitā); first or the beginning of the second century (sampādakīya, 14, in ed. hh of the Carakasamhitā). 611 NCC XI, 89–90. 612 NCC XII, 23: Pātañjalatantra. 613 Ad Govindasena's Paribhāṣāpradīpa 3.67–69. 614 Paribhāṣāpradīpa 3.63; comments ad 3.24. 615 Ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 52–53, 55–56, 61, 63–64, 67–72, 83–84, 107. 616 Ṭodara IX: 1.118. 617 Ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 45–47 (twice), 55–56, 76, 81, 122. 618 Ad Śārṅgadharasamhitā II.11.48cd–53ab. 619 Ad Cakradatta, arśas 180. 620 Śivadāsasena ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 67–72 and 89–90; Niścala ad Cakradatta, arśas 180. 621 Śivadāsasena ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 52–53. 622 Ad Rasaratnasamuccaya 5.136–140 (compare Śivadāsa ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 81) and 28.59–83 (compare Śivadāsa ad Cakradatta, rasāyana 122). 623 See the description of Satyanārāyaṇaśāstrin's work. 624 Āyurvijñānaratnākara I.3.116 = Yogasūtra, vibhūtipāda 39. 625 Bhaiṣajyaratnāvalī, grahaṇī 178–184 (bṛhanmethīmodaka). 626 B. Seal (1985): 63–64. 627 HIM III, 781 (two MSS are recorded). P.V. Sharma (AVI 207) refers to the Siddhāntasārāvalī only. G. Hāldār (Vrddhatrayī 29) regards these works as parts of one treatise, called Vātaskandhapaitṭaskandhopetasiddhāntasārāvalī (one MS is mentioned). 628 Gulabkunverba I, 146. Jaggi IV, 21. H. Parāḍkar 18. This tradition may be connected with that concerning Patañjali's Lohaśāstra, quoted in Śivadāsa's commentary on the rasāyana chapter of the Cakradatta. 629 E. Sachau (1964): I, 80 and 189. Al-Bīrūnī refers to Yogasūtra, kaivalyapāda 1, and its commentaries. See on the Kitāb Patañjal quoted by al-Bīrūnī: S. Dasgupta (1975): I, 233–236 (Dasgupta points to the differences between this work and the Yogasūtra; he regards as its author the Patañjali who also wrote the Lohaśāstra and a commentary on the Carakasamhitā; S. Pines and T. Gelblum assume that Dasgupta was not acquainted with the MS of al-Bīrūnī's Arabic version of the Yogasūtra, discovered by Massignon in 1922); S. Pines and T. Gelblum (1974): XIII–XV; H. Ritter (1956); A. Roṣu (1982); E. Sachau (1964): II, 263–264 (E. Sachau was led astray by the quotations and concluded that the work was totally different from the Yogasūtra). See on al-Bīrūnī's knowledge of his Indian sources: J. Gonda (1975a). 630 Cakrapāṇidatta calls him Ahipati. 631 P.V. Sharma (1970a): 25. Vrddhatrayī 21. J.H. Woods (1966): Intr. XIV. Edited by Paṇḍit Śivadatta and K.P. Parab, Kāvyamālā No. 51, Nirṇaya-sāgara Press, Bombay 1895 [IO.28.F. 5 and 6]. See on Rāmabhadra Dīkṣita, who, on account of his exceptionally high proficiency in grammar, was called the new Patañjali (pratyagrapatañjali): T.S. Kuppuswami Sastri (1904). Veṅkaṭeśvara, one of Rāmabhadra's pupils, wrote a commentary on the Patañjalicarita (see T.S. Kuppuswami Sastri, 1904: 176–177). 632 CC I, 517. T.S. Kuppuswami Sastri (1904). 633 Vrddhatrayī 21 and 30–31. This assertion creates confusion because the quotation (= Ca. Ci.26.125ab) is attributed to Kārttika in most of the editions of the Madhukośa. The edition used by G. Hāldār had obviously Vārttika instead of Kārttika.