A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c35.53

v2.c35.53

706 Cf. Ca.Ci.25.80. 707 Cf. Su.Ci.2.8cd–10ab. 708 Cf. Su.Ci.2.10cd–12ab and 19cd–23ab. 709 Cf. Su.Ci.2.81. 710 Cf. Su.Ci.2.26cd–28ab. 711 Cf. Ca.Ci.25.65cd–66ab. 712 Cf. Su.Ci.2.26cd–28ab. 713 Cf. Su.Ci.2.23cd–26ab. 714 Cf. Su.Ci.2.85cd–86ab. 715 Cf. Su.Ci.2.77ab. 716 Cf. Su.Ci.2.29cd–30. 717 Cf. Su.Ci.2.42–45ab. 718 Cf. Su.Ci.2.31. 719 Cf. Su.Ci.2.32–33. 720 Cf. Su.Ci.2.34–35. 721 Cf. Su.Ci.2.66cd–69ab. 722 This verse is very close to Su.Ci.2.37. 723 Cf. Su.Ci.2.69cd–71ab. A.h.U.26.28cd and 29cd are close to Su.Ci.2.69cd and 71ab. 724 Cf. Su.Ci.2.71cd–72ab. 725 Cf. Su.Ci.2.72cd–73ab. 726 Cf. Su.Ci.2.13cd–16ab. 727 This verse is close to Su.Ci.2.16cd–17ab. 728 Cf. Su.Ci.2.17cd–18ab. 729 Cf. Su.Ci.2.18cd–19ab. 730 Cf. Su.Ci.2.51. 731 Cf. Su.Ci.2.52–54ab. 732 A.h.U.26.40ab = Su.Ci.2.54cd. 733 This verse is close to Su.Ci.2.55. 734 A.h.U.26.43 = Su.Ci.2.56, but Suśruta’s pipīlikā is replaced by utpaṅgila. The edition with Śivadāsa’s commentary reads upaṅgila; Śivadāsa’s commentary has upaliṅga, explained as an ant known as ḍāhī. The Kairalī has uluṅgila, explained as markoṭaka. 735 Cf. Su.Ci.2.57–60ab. A.h.U.26.44 = Su.Ci.2.57. 736 Cf. Su.Ci.2.60cd–61ab. 737 Cf. Su.Ci.2.61cd–62ab. 738 Cf. Su.Ci.2.62cd–66ab. A.h.U.26.49cd = Su.Ci.2.63cd. 739 Cf. Su.Ci.2.45cd–49. 740 A.h.U.26.55–56ab = Su.Ci.2.75–76ab. 741 Cf. Su.Ci.2.77cd–78. 742 Compare the German translation of R.F.G. Müller (1949): 239–242. 743 Cf. Su.Ni.15.3–4. 744 Cf. Su.Ni.15.6. 745 Cf. Su.Ni.15.9. 746 Cf. Su.Ni.15.11; Ci.3.3. 747 A.h.U.27.7–10ab is almost identical with Su.Ni.15.12–15ab. 748 Almost identical with Su.Ni.15.16cd–17. 749 A.h.U.27.11cd–12 = Su.Ci.3.17cd–18.