A History of Indian Medical Literature v4.c58.69

v4.c58.69

h Yogaśatakam of Śrī Paṇḍitarāya (with the commentary of Pūrṇasena), ed. by H. Shankarganapathi Pathak and C. Srinivasa Somayaji, University of Mysore Oriental Research Institute Series 151, Mysore 1985. References are to f. 453 The Yogaśataka is sometimes ascribed to Śrīpaṇḍita (STMI 216 and 249; Cat. Mysore XIII, Nrs. 42281–86; R. Mitra's Notices IX, Nr. 3128: 943 verses) or Dhanvantari (STMI 216 and 249). 454 See for a complete index of metres ed. e, 271; ed. f, 21; ed. g, XXXIII–XXXIV. 455 According to Bhagwan Dash the text contains exactly one hundred recipes (ed. e, 251). 456 The popular names of these yogas are to be found in notes to ed. e. 457 Their number is 105 (ed. c), 109 (Sanskrit and Tibetan text of ed. g), 111 (Sanskrit text of ed. e; Sanskrit and Tibetan text of ed. f), 124 (Tibetan text of ed. e; the high number results in this case from counting a colophon as a verse), 157 (ed. h). D. Wujastyk (1990: 109–110) records a MS of a Vṛddhayogaśata [Bodleian c.305(4)] that consists of 363 verses, and another one with 323 verses [Bodleian d.727(4)]. R. Mitra (Notices IX, Nr. 3128) describes a MS of Śrīpaṇḍita's Yogaśataka that consists of no less than 943 ślokas. 458 See: Anantakumāra. 459 According to Vācaka Dīpacandra (see JAI 155). 460 See: Nidānadīpikā. 461 See A.A. Ramanathan (1971): Intr. 70. 462 Ad Cakradatta, jvara 1, 141 (= Yogaśataka 5), 277 (= 40); arśas 64 (= 28); agnimāndya 12 (= 29), 14 (tasyaiva; absent from ed. f of the Yogaśataka), 15 (tasyaiva; = 31); hikkāśvāsa 9 (= 24) and 15 (absent from ed. f); chardi 27 (= 34); vātarakta 6 (= 17); śūla 50 (= 21) and 54 (= 19); gulma 40 (= 22) and 46 (= 25); mūtraḳcchra 7 (= 16) and 24 (= 15); aśmarī 32 (= 14); prameha 17 (= 9); udara 50 (= 12); kuṣṭha 20 (= 37); mukharoga 73–74 (= 30); netraroga 29 (= 50). 463 Yogaratnākara 365, 371, 388, 397, 425, 446, 474. 464 See Anantakumāra: the Yogaśataka is quoted. 465 Not quoted in connection with the Yogaśataka. See: Niścala. 466 The correspondences between the Yogaśataka and these later texts are indicated in edition e, and, more accurately, in ed. f. 467 See Niścala's references to the Yogaśataka. 468 Ṭoḍara III: 2.97; 2.76 and 78–81, erroneously said to be from the Cikitsākalikā, are actually from the Yogaśataka. 469 It contains Yogaśataka 18–20, 85–88, 99–102 and 109. 470 These bilingual fragments were published first by S. Lévi, Étude des documents tokhariens de la mission Pelliot, I, Les Bilingues, JA 17, 1911, 431–449. They were studied again and translated into French by J. Filliozat, Fragments de textes koutchéens de médecine et de magie; texte, parallèles sanscrits et tibétains, traduction et glossaire; Paris, 1948. 471 J. Filliozat (1948: 8) dated the MSS as probably belonging to the early part of the period A.D. 500–1000; later (L. Renou and J. Filliozat, 1953: 157) he assigned them to the seventh century or somewhat earlier. 472 References to the editions of the Tanjur, its catalogues, etc., are to be found in ed. f (38). 473 See ed. e (9–17) on the Tibetan translations of twenty-two āyurvedic works incorporated in the Tanjur. Compare P. Cordier (1903a). 474 This is the interpretation of P. Cordier (1903a: 606), Manfred Taube (1981: 17), and Bhagwan Dash (ed. e, 248), which seems preferable to H.H.M. Schmidt's rendering 'the commentary on the text', because the Tibetan has rća ḥgrel.