金剛般若經疏論纂要 2.250
金剛般若經疏論纂要 2.250
- Language
- Classical Chinese
2.250
「何以故？若世界實有者，則是一合相，如來說一合相，則非一合相，是名一合相。」
"Why is this? If worlds were real existents, then they would be a unitary composite mark. The unitary composite mark spoken of by the Tathāgata is not a unitary composite mark; it is named a unitary composite mark."
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (8)
- 金剛般若經贊述 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經論 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經註解 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經論 — Classical Chinese
- 梁朝傅大士頌金剛經 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經略疏 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經 — Classical Chinese
- 金剛般若波羅蜜經 — Classical Chinese