金剛般若波羅蜜經略疏 2.45

2.45

「須菩提！若善男子善女人，以三千大千世界微塵，復以爾許微塵世界碎為微塵阿僧祇。須菩提！於意云何？是微塵眾寧為多不？」須菩提言：「彼微塵眾甚多。世尊！何以故？若是微塵眾實有者，佛則不說是微塵眾。何以故？佛說微塵眾，則非微塵眾，是故佛說微塵眾。世尊！如來所說三千大千世界，則非世界，是故佛說三千大千世界。何以故？若世界實有者，則是一合相。如來說一合相則非一合相，是故佛說一合相。」佛言：「須菩提！一合相者則是不可說，但凡夫之人貪著其事。何以故？須菩提！若人如是言：『佛說我見人見眾生見壽者見。』須菩提！於意云何？是人所說為正語不？」須菩提言：「不也。世尊！何以故？世尊！如來說我見人見眾生見壽者見，即非我見人見眾生見壽者見，是名我見人見眾生見壽者見。」

"Subhūti, suppose a good man or good woman were to take the motes of dust of a great trichiliocosm, and further crush that many dust-mote worlds into an asaṃkhyeya of motes of dust. Subhūti, what do you think? Would that collection of dust motes be numerous?" Subhūti said, "That collection of dust motes would be extremely numerous, World-Honored One. Why is this? If this collection of dust motes were real existents, the Buddha would not speak of a collection of dust motes. Why is this? What the Buddha speaks of as a collection of dust motes is not a collection of dust motes; therefore the Buddha speaks of a collection of dust motes. World-Honored One, what the Tathāgata speaks of as a great trichiliocosm is not a world; therefore the Buddha speaks of a great trichiliocosm. Why is this? If worlds were real existents, they would be an integrated composite (saṅghāta-lakṣaṇa). What the Tathāgata speaks of as an integrated composite is not an integrated composite; therefore the Buddha speaks of an integrated composite." The Buddha said, "Subhūti, an integrated composite is ineffable, yet ordinary persons grasp greedily at its affairs. Why is this? Subhūti, if a person were to say: 'The Buddha taught the view of a self, the view of a person, the view of a sentient being, and the view of a life-span'—Subhūti, what do you think? Would what that person said be correct speech?" Subhūti said, "No, World-Honored One. Why is this? World-Honored One, what the Tathāgata spoke of as the view of a self, the view of a person, the view of a sentient being, and the view of a life-span is not the view of a self, the view of a person, the view of a sentient being, and the view of a life-span; this is named the view of a self, the view of a person, the view of a sentient being, and the view of a life-span."