Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

淨名玄論 6.9

淨名玄論 6.9

Language
Classical Chinese

6.9

問:今且舉《成論》明三假義,不墮失門。何者?彼明三假有為世諦,三假空為真諦。即三假而常四忘、即四忘而常三假。即三假而常四忘,故有不自有;即四忘而常三假,故空不自空。故非性義。答:三假為世諦、四忘為真諦者,世諦之有,為待真空、為不待耶?即此一責,便墮二負門。若言世諦待真諦者,則世諦為能待、真諦為所待,二諦便是相待假,何得定三假是世諦、四忘為真諦耶?若言世諦之有不待真空者,既不相待,便成自性。故不可答也。問:世諦之有,不得待真諦之體,以真體絕故不可相待。答:今世諦之有待世諦。真若之名故。有待於無。無上過也。

Question: Suppose we now cite the Tattvasiddhi-śāstra's explanation of the three provisionalities (saṃjñā) to show it does not fall into error. Why? That text explains that the three provisionalities as existent are saṃvṛti-satya, while the three provisionalities as empty are paramārtha-satya. Being identical with the three provisionalities, it is always the four negations (catur-vācā); being identical with the four negations, it is always the three provisionalities. Being identical with the three provisionalities yet always the four negations, existence does not exist of itself; being identical with the four negations yet always the three provisionalities, emptiness is not empty of itself. Therefore, it does not mean svabhāva. Answer: If the three provisionalities are saṃvṛti-satya and the four negations are paramārtha-satya, does the existence of saṃvṛti-satya depend on true emptiness, or does it not depend on it? This single interrogation leads to two unacceptable conclusions. If you say that saṃvṛti-satya depends on paramārtha-satya, then saṃvṛti-satya is that which depends and paramārtha-satya is that which is depended upon; the two truths would then merely be provisionality of mutual dependence. How then could one fix the three provisionalities as saṃvṛti-satya and the four negations as paramārtha-satya? If you say that the existence of saṃvṛti-satya does not depend on true emptiness, then since it is not mutually dependent, it becomes svabhāva. Therefore, it cannot be answered [in this way]. Question: The existence of saṃvṛti-satya cannot depend on the essence of paramārtha-satya, because the true essence is transcendent and therefore cannot enter mutual dependence. Answer: Now, if the existence of saṃvṛti-satya depends on the name of saṃvṛti-satya and the name of paramārtha-satya, existence depends on non-existence, and there is no such fault.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)