楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 3.52

3.52

如來既釋有無之相以詶大慧之請，因問此二者之問，何等是破壞佛法者。大慧乃答以彼先取三毒性為有，後計為無者，是破壞義。佛可其說，乃云非但計無為壞，亦壞二乘及佛。蓋彼謂佛與二乘亦本取三毒為有，後除三毒為無，得成聖果，故云亦是壞者。所以者何下，謂聖人了達內外諸法皆不可得，亦了煩惱之性本離一異等四句，何壞之有？

Having explained the characteristics of existence and nonexistence in response to Mahāmati's request, the Tathāgata then asks which among these two is a destroyer of the Buddha Dharma. Mahāmati then answers that one who first grasps the nature of the three poisons as existent and later conceptualizes them as nonexistent is the meaning of a destroyer. The Buddha approves his statement, and then says that not only is conceptualizing nonexistence a destroyer, but they also destroy the two vehicles and the Buddha. For they claim that the Buddha and the two vehicles also originally grasped the three poisons as existent, and later eliminated the three poisons into nonexistence to attain the holy fruit; hence it is said, "they are also destroyers." From "why is that" downward means that the sages thoroughly realize that all internal and external dharmas are ungraspable, and also realize that the nature of afflictions is originally free from the catuṣkoṭi of identity and difference and the like; what destruction could there be?