俱舍論記 14.63

14.63

「此責非理至成有差別」者，釋。表色昧鈍故，依他心起故。心等明利、不依他起。等謂等取諸心所法。二無記心望善、不善心成其劣。無記表業從劣心起，其力倍劣彼能起心，所以不成過去、未來。故表與心成有差別，不可為例。又《正理》云「此責非理，所起劣於能起心故。所以然者？如無記心能發表業，所發表業不生無表，故知所起劣能起心。」

"[If you say,] 'This reprimand is unreasonable … that they differ in possession'" is the explanation. This is because matter of vijñapti is dull and obscure, and arises dependent on another, namely the mind. The mind and so forth are sharp and clear, and do not arise dependent on another. "And so forth" means including the mental factors (caittas). The two indeterminate minds are inferior compared to wholesome and unwholesome minds. Indeterminate vijñapti-karma arises from an inferior mind; its power is doubly inferior to that of the mind which can generate it, and that is why it does not possess [it in] the past or the future. Therefore, vijñapti and mind differ in possession, and cannot be cited as parallel examples. Furthermore, the *Nyāyānusāra* says: "This reprimand is unreasonable, because what is produced is inferior to the mind that produces it. Why is that? As an indeterminate mind can produce vijñapti-karma, yet the produced vijñapti-karma does not produce avijñapti, hence we know that what is produced is inferior to the producing mind."