俱舍論疏 29.161

29.161

論「又立此為六識所識至彼依意故」，第二違經失也。若我眼見及耳聞等，即是異根亦能受用異根行處。即違經說：梵志當知，五根行處境界各別，各唯受用自所行處及自境界，非有異根亦能受用異根行處及異根境。五根唯受用自境界，故受用五根行處。及意境界，唯依意故。

The treatise says: "Moreover, if one establishes this as cognized by the six consciousnesses... because that is based on the mind." This is the second fault, contradicting scripture. If the self were seen by the eye and heard by the ear and so forth, then a different sense-faculty would also be able to experience the sphere of activity of another sense-faculty. This contradicts what the sūtra states: "Brahmin, you should know that the spheres of activity and domains of the five faculties are each distinct; each experiences only its own sphere of activity and its own domain, and there is no other faculty that can also experience the sphere of activity and domain of another faculty." The five faculties experience only their own domains; therefore, experiencing the spheres of activity of the five faculties and the domain of the mind is based solely on the mind.