俱舍論頌疏論本 26.49

26.49

餘說有論故者，有餘西方師說：有無漏行相越此十六，由《識身足本論》說故。彼論說云：「頗有不繫心能分別欲界繫法耶（彼論問也）？曰：能分別，謂非常故、苦故、空故、非我故、因故、集故、生故、緣故，有如是處，有如是事，如理所引了別（已上本論答前問）。」西方論師意，彼論既於非常等八行相外，言別有有是處、有是事二行相，故知離十六行相外別有有是處、有是事二無漏行相也。

As for "others say there are, because of a treatise": certain western masters say that there are undefiled aspects exceeding these sixteen, on account of what is stated in the Vijñānakāyaśāstra. That treatise says: 'Can a mind not bound [to any realm] distinguish phenomena bound to the desire realm (this is that treatise's question)? Answer: It can distinguish them, namely, as impermanent, suffering, empty, non-self, cause, origin, arising, condition, having such a place, and having such a fact, which are cognitions induced by correct reasoning (the above is the root treatise answering the preceding question).' In the view of the western masters, since that treatise states that there are two distinct aspects—having such a place and having such a fact—apart from the eight aspects such as impermanence, one knows that apart from the sixteen aspects there are distinctly the two undefiled aspects of having such a place and having such a fact.